Smart Study Co., Ltd. v. Apple Star Enterprise, et al
| Smart Study Co., Ltd. |
| Apple Star Enterprise and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv00658 |
| January 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| John E McDermott |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 501 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/29/2020. (cw)
|
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Apple Star Enterprise.(Haney, Steven) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER Re Stipulation for Extension to Respond to Complaint (Dkt. #16 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is GRANTED. The deadline for Apple Star Enterprise to file a response to the Complaint (Dkt. 1) is continued from 2/18/2020 to 3/19/2020. (jp)
|
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Smart Study Co., Ltd., upon Defendant Apple Star Enterprise served on 1/27/2020, answer due 3/19/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Virginia Hung, Front Desk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Farnese, Peter) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Apple Star Enterprise answer now due 3/19/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Apple Star Enterprise. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order for Extension to Respond to Complaint)(Attorney Steven H Haney added to party Apple Star Enterprise(pty:dft))(Haney, Steven) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Kerry B. Brownlee on behalf of Plaintiff Smart Study Co., Ltd.. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Ashly E. Sands on behalf of Plaintiff Smart Study Co., Ltd.. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Jason M. Drangel on behalf of Plaintiff Smart Study Co., Ltd.. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) |
|
Filing 12
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Kerry B Brownlee. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Ashly E Sands. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jason M Drangel. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Apple Star Enterprise. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (esa) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Smart Study Co., Ltd.. (Farnese, Peter) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Smart Study Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnese, Peter) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Smart Study Co., Ltd., (Farnese, Peter) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Smart Study Co., Ltd.. (Farnese, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25168134 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Smart Study Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F) (Attorney Peter J Farnese added to party Smart Study Co., Ltd.(pty:pla))(Farnese, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
