Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Lulutrip, Inc. et al
| Minden Pictures, Inc. |
| Lulutrip, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10 |
| 2:2020cv00707 |
| January 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Clerk has reviewed the Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint (Dkt. 13) filed February 25, 2020; given substituted service, and mailing date of February 21, 2020, the deadline for defendant to respond is corrected to March 23, 2020. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc., upon Defendant Lulutrip, Inc. served on 2/19/2020, answer due 3/11/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon "Jane Doe" - Person in Charge, Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #10 as to Defendant Lulutrip, Inc. (jp) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #10 filed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc.(Doniger, Stephen) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Lulutrip, Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (esa) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Minden Pictures, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc., (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25177360 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc.. (Attorney Stephen M Doniger added to party Minden Pictures, Inc.(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
