Toby Brock v. GNC Holdings, Inc. et al
| Toby Brock |
| Does 1 though 10, inclusive and GNC Holdings, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00785 |
| January 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant GNC Holdings, Inc..(Taylor, Brett) |
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff Toby Brock to Oppose a Motion to Dismiss or File Amended Complaint #11 . (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS). (jp)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to GNC Holdings, Inc. answer now due 3/25/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant GNC Holdings, Inc..(Taylor, Brett) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Plaintiff Toby Brock to Oppose a Motion to Dismiss or File Amended Complaint filed by Defendant GNC Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff Toby Brock to Oppose a Motion to Dismiss or File Amended Complaint)(Attorney Brett Nicole Taylor added to party GNC Holdings, Inc.(pty:dft))(Taylor, Brett) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Toby Brock, upon Defendant GNC Holdings, Inc. served on 2/3/2020, answer due 2/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Stefoni Murphy - Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Clarkson, Ryan) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (pbl)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant GNC Holdings, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF Toby Brock, identifying Defendant GNC Holdings, Inc.. (Clarkson, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by PLAINTIFF Toby Brock. (Clarkson, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Toby Brock. (Clarkson, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25190235 - Fee: $400, filed by PLAINTIFF Toby Brock. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF TOBY BROCK REGARDING VENUE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1780(d)) (Attorney Ryan J Clarkson added to party Toby Brock(pty:pla))(Clarkson, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
