Annemarie Cronin v. Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Annemarie Cronin
Defendant: Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corporation, Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv00816
Filed: January 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 IN CHAMBERS ORDER-TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by defendant - The motion is submitted. Order to issue. The hearing previously scheduled for 03/02/2020 at 1:30 p.m. is vacated and off-calendar. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
February 18, 2020 Filing 13 REPLY In support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #9 filed by Defendant Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Supp. A. Canchola Dec. with Exs. 16 & 17, #2 Declaration Supp. G. Nigolian Dec.)(Nigolian, Grant)
February 10, 2020 Filing 12 OPPOSITION Opposition to Defendant's MOTION FOR STAY OF ACTION OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #9 filed by Plaintiff Annemarie Cronin. (Novak, Sean)
February 10, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE OF FILING BANKRUPTCY filed by Plaintiff Annemarie Cronin. as to ANNEMARIE CRONIN, Bankruptcy Court case number 2:19-bk-14801. (Novak, Sean)
February 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
February 3, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by defendant Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp.. Motion set for hearing on 3/2/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration A. Canchola, #3 Declaration G. Nigolian, #4 Exhibit Compendium - Nos. 1-15) (Nigolian, Grant)
January 29, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
January 29, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car)
January 27, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp., Does 1 through 50, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Annemarie Cronin. Filed in state Court on 12/16/2019 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
January 27, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corporation. correcting Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #5 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Service of Notice to Adverse Party of Removal)(Nigolian, Grant)
January 27, 2020 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (via Fed Ex overnight delivery) served on 01/27/2020. (Nigolian, Grant)
January 27, 2020 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corporation, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on 01/27/2020. (Nigolian, Grant)
January 27, 2020 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corporation, (Nigolian, Grant)
January 27, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corporation. (Nigolian, Grant)
January 27, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 19STCV45231 Receipt No: 0973-25195953 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Nos. 1-7) (Attorney Grant A Nigolian added to party Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corporation(pty:dft))(Nigolian, Grant)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Annemarie Cronin v. Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corporation
Represented By: Grant A Nigolian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp.
Represented By: Grant A Nigolian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annemarie Cronin
Represented By: Sean M Novak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?