Orlando Garcia v. A.O.P.N. Corp., et al
| Orlando Garcia |
| A.O.P.N. Corp., and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2020cv00847 |
| January 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant A.O.P.N. Corp.,, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #17 and related [Proposed] Order served on March 27, 2020. (Babachanian, Sarkis) |
| Filing 17 Corrected STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File filed by defendant A.O.P.N. Corp.,. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Babachanian, Sarkis) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File filed by Defendant A.O.P.N. Corp.,. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Babachanian, Sarkis) |
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than March 30,, 2020 why this action shouldnot be dismissed for lack of prosecution.The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendant. In the event both documents are filed before the above date, the answer will take precedence.Answer by the defendant(s). No argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to A.O.P.N. Corp., answer now due 3/25/2020, filed by Defendant A.O.P.N. Corp.,.(Attorney Sarkis Jacob Babachanian added to party A.O.P.N. Corp.,(pty:dft))(Babachanian, Sarkis) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court has reviewed the Response filed by Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel to the Court's Order to Show Cause #10 #12 . For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. The Court therefore dismisses that claim without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1367 (c)(4). (lom)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garciato Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #8 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of Service)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant A.O.P.N. Corp., served on 2/3/2020, answer due 2/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Alireza Nejad Zolfaghari Mon in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than February 12, 2020. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of that claimpursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (lc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant A.O.P.N. Corp. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25203966 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
