Shamar Jackson v. Gervous E. Helton et al
Plaintiff: Shamar Jackson
Defendant: DOES 1-10 and Gervous E. Helton
Case Number: 2:2020cv00877
Filed: January 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2020 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shamar Jackson, upon Defendant Gervous E. Helton served on 2/21/2020, answer due 3/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gervous Helton in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hakimi, Anoush)
January 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake)
January 29, 2020 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Gervous E. Helton. (esa)
January 29, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
January 29, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (esa)
January 28, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Shamar Jackson, (Shahriari, Peter)
January 28, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shamar Jackson. (Shahriari, Peter)
January 28, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Shamar Jackson. (Shahriari, Peter)
January 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25210853 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Shamar Jackson. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party Shamar Jackson(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shamar Jackson v. Gervous E. Helton et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shamar Jackson
Represented By: Peter Shahriari
Represented By: Anoush Hakimi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gervous E. Helton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?