Shamar Jackson v. NoHo Union LLC et al
Plaintiff: Shamar Jackson
Defendant: DOES 1-10 and NoHo Union LLC
Case Number: 2:2020cv00879
Filed: January 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: granting #11 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Defendants. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 6/5/2020. (sbou)
February 24, 2020 Filing 11 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant NoHo Union LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Megan Ann Childress added to party NoHo Union LLC(pty:dft)) (Childress, Megan)
February 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS by Judge George H. Wu. (lom)
January 29, 2020 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #3 as to Defendant NoHo Union LLC. (lh)
January 29, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
January 29, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh)
January 28, 2020 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Shamar Jackson, (Shahriari, Peter)
January 28, 2020 Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shamar Jackson. (Shahriari, Peter)
January 28, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #3 filed by plaintiff Shamar Jackson. (Shahriari, Peter)
January 28, 2020 Filing 3 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 1/28/2020, receipt number 0973-25210926), filed by plaintiff Shamar Jackson.(Shahriari, Peter)
January 28, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Shamar Jackson. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Shahriari, Peter)
January 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25210926 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Shamar Jackson. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party Shamar Jackson(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shamar Jackson v. NoHo Union LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shamar Jackson
Represented By: Peter Shahriari
Represented By: Anoush Hakimi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NoHo Union LLC
Represented By: Megan Ann Childress
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?