James Shayler v. Rozina Piredina et al
Plaintiff: James Shayler
Defendant: DOES 1-10 and Rozina Piredina
Case Number: 2:2020cv00886
Filed: January 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S Gutierrez
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause re: Supplemental Jurisdiction by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Civil Rights Act. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than March 31, 2020 why it should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. (bm)
February 24, 2020 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Shayler, upon Defendant Rozina Piredina served on 2/16/2020, answer due 3/9/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rozina Piredina in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hakimi, Anoush)
January 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
January 29, 2020 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Rozina Piredina. (et)
January 29, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
January 29, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et)
January 28, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff James Shayler, (Shahriari, Peter)
January 28, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. (Shahriari, Peter)
January 28, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff James Shayler. (Shahriari, Peter)
January 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25211246 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff James Shayler. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party James Shayler (pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James Shayler v. Rozina Piredina et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rozina Piredina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Shayler
Represented By: Peter Shahriari
Represented By: Anoush Hakimi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?