Orlando Garcia v. Jesus Diaz et al
Orlando Garcia |
Does 1-10, Jesus Diaz and Maria A. Diaz |
2:2020cv01008 |
January 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/29/2020. (cw) |
Filing 14 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT AS TO JESUS DIAZ (DKT. #12 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court orders the Clerk's Entry of Default as to Jesus Diaz (Dkt. 12) set aside; defendant's Answer (Dkt. #13 ) is accepted as filed. (jp) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendants Jesus Diaz, Maria A. Diaz. (jp) |
Filing 12 [DOCUMENT SET ASIDE PER ORDER DATED ON 3/12/2020, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #14 ] - DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Jesus Diaz (yl). Modified on 3/12/2020 (jp). |
Filing 11 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Jesus Diaz filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service) (Grace, Phyl) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Maria A. Diaz served on 2/12/2020, answer due 3/4/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Price, Dennis) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Jesus Diaz served on 2/5/2020, answer due 2/26/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 8 'TANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Jesus Diaz, Maria A. Diaz. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25231162 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.