Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell |
| Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| Justin Sanders |
| Knight Law Group LLP |
| 2:2020cv01095 |
| February 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| John F Walter |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 105
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE #104 by Judge John F. Walter. The Joint Stipulation is approved. The entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. (iv)
|
| Filing 104 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice)(Mikhov, Steve) |
|
Filing 103
ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES #102 by Judge John F. Walter. Defendant shall pay the sum of $75,000.00 to Plaintiff and Plaintiff hereby agrees to accept said payment in full satisfaction of all claims for attorney's fees, costs and expenses in connection with this action. Defendant shall pay the sum of $75,000.00 to Plaintiff within 60 days of July 13, 2021. (iv)
|
| Filing 102 Joint STIPULATION for Attorney Fees in the amount of $75,000.00 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Stipulation Regarding Plaintiff's Attorney's Fees, Costs and Expenses)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
|
Filing 101
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES [filed 4/2/21; Docket No. #73 ] AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COSTS AND EXPENSES [filed 4/2/21; Docket No. #74 ] by Judge John F. Walter. The Court concludes that the parties should share the cost associated with the special master equally, but the Court will consider a recommendation, if any, by the special master regarding the final allocation of the costs associated with the special master's services. The proceedings before the special master shall be completed by August 5, 2021, and the special master shall submit a Report and Recommendation to the Court by August 12, 2021. (iv)
|
| Filing 100 JOINT STATEMENT of Disputed Attorney's Fees, Costs and Expenses Pursuant to Court's April 30, 2021 Order NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Ford Motor Company #74 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees #73 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit HHH1 - Knight Law Group Invoice, #2 Exhibit HHH2 - The Altman Law Group Invoice, #3 Exhibit HHH3 - Plaintiff's Costs & Expenses Spreadsheet, #4 Exhibit III - Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Attorney's Fees Billing Entries, #5 Exhibit JJJ1 - Joint Separate Statement of Defendant's Objections and Plaintiff's Responses to Plaintiff's Motions for Attorney's Fees, Costs and Expenses, #6 Exhibit JJJ2 - Summary Table for Attorney's Fees for Knight Law Group, #7 Exhibit JJJ3 - Summary Table for Attorney's Fees for The Altman Law Group, #8 Exhibit JJJ4 - Summary Table for Plaintiff's Costs and Expenses)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 99 Text Entry Order: The parties have failed to deliver Courtesy Copies of the Joint Statement Regarding Plaintiffs Motions for Attorneys Fees, Costs and Expenses Pursuant to Courts April 30, 2021 Order, filed June 2, 2021 (Docket No. #97 ), that comply with paragraph 3(c) of the Court's Standing Order which provides in relevant part: If such evidence exceeds fifty pages, the Courtesy Copies of such evidence shall be placed in a slant D-ring binder with each item of evidence separated by a tab divider on the right side. All documents contained in the binder must be three hole punched with the oversized 13/32 hole size, not the standard 9/32 hole size. The binder shall include a Table of Contents and the spine of the binder shall be labeled with its contents. Accordingly, Docket No. #97 is STRICKEN.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 98 DECLARATION of Daniel Kalinowski as to Filing of Joint Statement Regarding NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Ford Motor Company #74 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees #73 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - May 27, 2021 Rapid Legal Courtesy Copy Order Confirmation, #2 Exhibit B - Courtesy Copy Delivery Order Execution Confirmation Email, #3 Exhibit C - June 2, 2021 First Legal Courtesy Copy Order Confirmation)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 97 *Stricken* JOINT STATEMENT of Disputed Attorney's Fees, Costs and Expenses Pursuant to Court's April 30, 2021 Order NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Ford Motor Company #74 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees #73 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit HHH1 - Knight Law Group Invoice, #2 Exhibit HHH2 - The Altman Law Group Invoice, #3 Exhibit HHH3 - Plaintiff's Costs & Expenses Spreadsheet, #4 Exhibit III - Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Attorney's Fees Billing Entries, #5 Exhibit JJJ1 - Joint Separate Statement of Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Responses to Plaintiff's Motions for Attorney's Fees, Costs and Expenses, #6 Exhibit JJJ2 - Summary Table for Attorney's Fees for Knight Law Group, #7 Exhibit JJJ3 - Summary Table for Attorney's Fees for The Altman Law Group, #8 Exhibit JJJ4 - Summary Table for Plaintiff's Costs and Expenses)(Kalinowski, Daniel) Modified on 6/4/2021 (sr). |
| Filing 96 Text Entry Order: The parties have failed to deliver Courtesy Copies of the Joint Statement Regarding Plaintiffs Motions for Attorneys Fees, Costs and Expenses Pursuant to Courts April 30, 2021 Order (Joint Statement), filed May 27, 2021 (Docket No. #95 ), that comply with paragraph 3(c) of the Court's Standing Order. Accordingly, the Joint Statement (Docket No. #95 ) is STRICKEN.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 95 *Stricken* JOINT STATEMENT of Disputed Attorney's Fees, Costs and Expenses Pursuant to Court's April 30, 2021 Order NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Ford Motor Company #74 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees #73 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit HHH1 - Knight Law Group Invoice, #2 Exhibit HHH2 - The Altman Law Group Invoice, #3 Exhibit HHH3 - Plaintiff's Costs & Expenses Spreadsheet, #4 Exhibit III - Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Attorney's Fees Billing Entries, #5 Exhibit JJJ1 - Joint Separate Statement of Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Responses to Plaintiff's Motions for Attorney's Fees, Costs and Expenses, #6 Exhibit JJJ2 - Summary Table for Attorney's Fees for Knight Law Group, #7 Exhibit JJJ3 - Summary Table for Attorney's Fees for The Altman Law Group, #8 Exhibit JJJ4 - Summary Table for Plaintiff's Costs and Expenses)(Kalinowski, Daniel) Modified on 5/28/2021 (sr). |
| Filing 94 Text Entry Order: On April 30, 2021, the Court entered an Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees and an Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Costs and Expenses (Docket No. #85 ). In the April 30, 2021 Order, the Court ordered the parties to file a Joint Statement on or before May 17, 2021. Although the docket indicates that the Joint Statement was filed on May 17, 2021 (Docket No. #93 ), counsel failed to deliver courtesy copies in accordance with the Courts Standing Order and Scheduling and Case Management Order. Accordingly, the Joint Statement (Docket No. #93 ) is STRICKEN.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 93 *Stricken* JOINT STATEMENT of Disputed Attorneys Fees, Costs and Expenses Pursuant to Courts April 30, 2021 Order NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Ford Motor Company #74 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees #73 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit HHH1 - Knight Law Group Invoice, #2 Exhibit HHH2 - The Altman Law Group Invoice, #3 Exhibit HHH3 - Plaintiff's Costs & Expenses Spreadsheet, #4 Exhibit III - Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Attorney's Fees Billing Entries, #5 Exhibit JJJ1 - Joint Separate Statement of Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Responses to Plaintiff's Motions for Attorney's Fees, Costs and Expenses, #6 Exhibit JJJ2 - Summary Table for Attorney's Fees for Knight Law Group, #7 Exhibit JJJ3 - Summary Table for Attorney's Fees for The Altman Law Group, #8 Exhibit JJJ4 - Summary Table for Plaintiff's Costs and Expenses)(Kalinowski, Daniel) Modified on 5/26/2021 (sr). |
| Filing 92 DECLARATION of Sabrina C. Narain re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #89 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 91 DECLARATION of Justin H. Sanders re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #89 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 90 DECLARATION of Daniel Kalinowski re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #89 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
|
Filing 89
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DECLINING DISCHARGE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge John F. Walter. In light of the foregoing, the Court will give the parties an opportunity to file on or before May 14, 2021, a supplemental response to the Courts Order to Show Cause which shall include a declaration by the attorney who signed the Civil Cover Sheet on behalf of Ford that addresses the issues raised by the Court. (iv)
|
| Filing 88 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Ford Motor Companyto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #86 and Declaration of Justin H. Sanders (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 87 DECLARATION of Daniel Kalinowski re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #86 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
|
Filing 86
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COUNSEL SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO NOTIFY COURT OF RELATED CASE by Judge John F. Walter. The parties are ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than May 4, 2021 why the Court should not impose sanctions in the amount of $1,500.00 against both lead counsel for their failure to file a Notice of Related Cases as required by Local Rule 83-1.3.1, and why Defendant's counsel should not be referred to the Court's Standing Committee on Discipline for making false statements. (iv)
|
|
Filing 85
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES [filed 4/2/21; Docket No. #73 ]; and ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR COSTS AND EXPENSES [filed 4/2/21; Docket No. #74 ] by Judge John F. Walter. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Motion for Costs and Expenses are GRANTED. (iv)
|
| Filing 84 STATEMENT of [Proposed] Statement of Decision regarding Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan Odonnells Motion for Attorney Fees NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees #73 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 83 STATEMENT of [Proposed] Statement of Decision Regarding Ford Motion Companys Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Costs and Expenses NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Ford Motor Company #74 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 82 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Ford Motor Company #74 (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Statement of Decision Regarding Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell's Motion for Costs and Expenses)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 81 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees #73 (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Statement of Decision Regarding Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell's Motion for Attorney's Fees)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 80 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Ford Motor Company #74 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski in Support of Plaintiff's Reply, #2 Exhibit 4 - Document Production Cover Letter and USPS Receipts, #3 Exhibit 5 - Relevant Portions of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures, #4 Exhibit 6 - Relevant Portions of Plaintiff's Response to Interrogatories)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 79 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees #73 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski in Support of Plaintiff's Reply, #2 Exhibit CCC - Document Production Cover Letter and USPS Receipts, #3 Exhibit DDD - Relevant Portions of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures, #4 Exhibit EEE - Relevant Portions of Plaintiff's Response to Interrogatories, #5 Exhibit FFF - Notice of Deposition of PMK, #6 Exhibit GGG - Email of Meet and Confer Regarding Dealership Personnel Depositions)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 78 Objections re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees #73 Evidentiary Objections filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Steve Mikhov)(Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 77 Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees #73 with Exhibits filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Sabrina Narain, #2 Exhibit A_Ford's Rule 68 Offer, #3 Exhibit B_Plt's Objections to Ford's Rule 68 Offer, #4 Exhibit C_Ford's Meet and Confer Letter, #5 Exhibit D_Amended Ford's Rule 68 Offer, #6 Exhibit E_Plt's Cost Demand Chart, #7 Exhibit F_Knight Law billing Chart, #8 Exhibit G_Altman billing Chart, #9 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 76 Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski ISO of Mtn for Costs Evidentiary Objections re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Ford Motor Company #74 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 75 DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COSTS AND EXPENSES re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Ford Motor Company #74 with Exhibits filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Sabrina Narain, #2 Exhibit A_Ford's Rule 68 Offer, #3 Exhibit B_Plt's Objections to Ford's Rule 68 Offer, #4 Exhibit C_Ford's Meet and Confer Letter, #5 Exhibit D_Amended Ford's Rule 68 Offer, #6 Exhibit E_Plt's Cost Demand Chart, #7 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 74 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Ford Motor Company filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. Motion set for hearing on 5/3/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Costs and Expenses, #2 Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski in Support of Motion for Costs and Expenses, #3 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Counsel Costs Spreadsheet & Supporting Invoices, #4 Exhibit 2 - Order on Motion to Re-Tax Costs in Arias v. Ford, #5 Exhibit 3 - Order on Motion for Costs and Attorneys' Fees in Bauman v. Ford) (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 73 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. Motion set for hearing on 5/3/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Attorney's Fees, #2 Declaration of Steve Mikhov in Support of Motion for Attorney's Fees, #3 Declaration of Bryan C. Altman in Support of Motion for Attorney's Fees, #4 Exhibit A - Knight Law Group, LLP Invoice, #5 Exhibit B - Retail Installment Sale Contract, #6 Exhibit C - Accepted Rule 68 Offer, #7 Exhibit D - Letter from Ford, #8 Exhibit E - Declaration of Spencer P. Hugret in Support of Notice of Removal in Gibson v. Ford, #9 Exhibit F - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Hernandez v. BMW, #10 Exhibit G - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Harbert v. FCA, #11 Exhibit H - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Krupsky v. Ford, #12 Exhibit I - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Dodd v. FCA, #13 Exhibit J - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Li v. FCA, #14 Exhibit K - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Blasco v. FCA, #15 Exhibit L - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Coon v. Ford, #16 Exhibit M - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Lawson v. FCA, #17 Exhibit N - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Stead v. Ford, #18 Exhibit O - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Ibanez v. FCA, #19 Exhibit P - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Cuevas v. FCA, #20 Exhibit Q - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Carrillo v. FCA, #21 Exhibit R - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Whitlow v. Ford, #22 Exhibit S - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Buckman v. FCA, #23 Exhibit T - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Kantar v. FCA, #24 Exhibit U - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Edralin v. FCA, #25 Exhibit V - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Duk v. Ford, #26 Exhibit W - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Rivas v. Ford, #27 Exhibit X - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Suazo v. FCA, #28 Exhibit Y - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Hopkins v. FCA, #29 Exhibit Z - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Bugiel v. Ford, #30 Exhibit AA - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Meuse v. FCA, #31 Exhibit BB - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Spelts v. FCA, #32 Exhibit CC - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Garrison v. FCA, #33 Exhibit DD - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Newberry v. Ford, #34 Exhibit EE - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Paul v. FCA, #35 Exhibit FF - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Lang v. Ford, #36 Exhibit GG - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Kortan v. Ford, #37 Exhibit HH - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Simmons v. Ford, #38 Exhibit II - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Perez v. FCA, #39 Exhibit JJ - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Soria v. FCA, #40 Exhibit KK - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Christensen v. Ford, #41 Exhibit LL - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Vargas v. FCA, #42 Exhibit MM - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Bahna v. Ford, #43 Exhibit NN - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Hitomi v. Ford, #44 Exhibit OO - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Vasquez v. Ford, #45 Exhibit PP - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Castillo v. Ford, #46 Exhibit QQ - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Allem v. FCA, #47 Exhibit RR - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in West v. Hyundai, #48 Exhibit SS - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Yudinova v. Ford, #49 Exhibit TT - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Harris v. Hyundai, #50 Exhibit UU - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Aspinall v. Kia, #51 Exhibit VV - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Murrillo v. FCA, #52 Exhibit WW - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Pumphrey v. Ford, #53 Exhibit XX - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Cofield v. Kia, #54 Exhibit YY - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Paige v. Kia, #55 Exhibit ZZ - Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees in Munguia v. Ford, #56 Exhibit AAA - The Altman Law Group Invoice, #57 Exhibit BBB - United States Consumer Law Attorney Fee Survey Report 2017-2018) (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
|
Filing 72
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. In the Notice of Settlement filed on March 18, 2021 #71 , the parties represent that they have settled this action. As a result, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice subject to either party reopening the action on or before May 7, 2021. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement until May 7, 2021. Thereafter, absent further order of the Court, the dismissal of this action will be with prejudice. All dates in this action, including the trial date are vacated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
|
| Filing 71 NOTICE of Settlement Joint Notice of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 70 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report Regarding Meet and Confer as to Stipulating to Remand the Action to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 69 DECLARATION of Rocio Barbeaux Regarding filing Ford Motor Company's Motion for Summary Judgment and Partial Summary Judgment NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #39 with exhibits filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Printout of Error message rejecting the filing, #2 Exhibit Confirmation of Personal Service, #3 Exhibit E-mail to Court's Clerk)(Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 68 DECLARATION of Sabrina Narain IN SUPPORT OF FORD MOTOR COMPANYS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #39 with exhibits filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiffs Complaint, #2 Exhibit Warranty Booklet, #3 Exhibit Excerpts from Deposition of Plaintiff, #4 Exhibit Retail Installment Sales Contract, #5 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiff's repair at Galpin Ford on September 8, 2010, #6 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on March 31, 2011, #7 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on January 25, 2012, #8 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on September 21, 2012, #9 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on May 7, 2013, #10 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on January 2, 2014, #11 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on July 7, 2014, #12 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on March 18, 2015, #13 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on July 9, 2015, #14 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on October 8, 2015, #15 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on February 13, 2016, #16 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on May 24, 2016, #17 Exhibit Invoice for for Plaintiffs repair at Palm Springs Motors, Inc. on November 28, 2016, #18 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Palm Springs Motors, Inc. on December 16, 2016, #19 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on May 23, 2017, #20 Exhibit Invoice for Plaintiffs repair at Galpin Ford on October 28, 2017, #21 Exhibit Plaintiff's Responses to Fords Interrogatories, #22 Exhibit Copy of Ruling in Mark Pedante v. Ford Motor Co., #23 Exhibit Copy of Ruling in Yvonne Quintero, et. al. v. Ford Motor Co.)(Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 67 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority and/or Request for Judicial Notice in Opposition to Defendant Ford Motor Company's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 50 - Jimenez v. FCA US LLC, Case No. MCC1801478 Ruling Dated December 17, 2020, #2 Exhibit 51 - Espinoza Aguirre v. Nissan North America, Inc., Case No. 20STCV05205 Ruling Dated December 17, 2020, #3 Exhibit 52 - Persaud v. Nissan North America Inc., Case No. RG20067438 Ruling Dated December 26, 2020, #4 Exhibit 53 - Ramirez, et al., v. FCA US, LLC, et al., Case No. 20STCV32561 Ruling Dated January 5, 2021, #5 Exhibit 54 - Ruelas v. Ford Motor Co., Case No. BC532131 Ruling Dated January 20, 2021, #6 Exhibit 55 Vazquez v. FCA US LLC, Case No. 37-2019-00024741-CU-BCCTL Ruling Dated January 29, 2021, #7 Exhibit 56 Baustista v. FCA US LLC et al., Case No. 20STCV06358 Ruling Dated February 2, 2021, #8 Exhibit 57 Pacheco v. Jeep Chrysler, Case No. CIVDS2012370 Ruling Dated February 8, 2021, #9 Exhibit 58 Cortez v. R&L Autos, Inc., Case No. 37-2020-00019919-CU-BCCTL Ruling Dated February 26, 2021)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 66 DECLARATION of Daniel Kalinowski in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #39 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 24 - Plaintiff's Deposition Testimony, #2 Exhibit 25 - Deposition Testimony of Galpin Motor's Service Advisor William Hernandes, #3 Exhibit 26 - Plaintiff's Expert Disclosure, #4 Exhibit 27 - Plaintiff's Expert Anthony Micale's Curriculum Vitae, #5 Exhibit 28 - Plaintiff's Document Production Served on January 9, 2020, #6 Exhibit 29 Deposition Testimony of Ford's Diesel Powertrain Systems Technical Specialist Mr. Brien Fulton's Testimony, #7 Exhibit 30 Deposition Testimony of Galpin Motors Person Most Qualified and Chief Technology Officer and Vice President of Innovation Andy Graff, #8 Exhibit 31 Deposition Testimony of Galpin Motors Technician Cesar Aguilar, #9 Exhibit 32 Fords Admission to Plaintiffs Request for Admission No. 14, #10 Exhibit 33 Deposition Testimony of Palm Springs Motors Person Most Qualified and Shop Foreman John Bruno, #11 Exhibit 34 - Deposition Testimony Of Palm Springs Motors Technician Sergio Segura, #12 Exhibit 35 - Ford Sales & Service Agreement, #13 Exhibit 36 - Technical Service Bulletin 07-17-3, #14 Exhibit 37 - Technical Service Bulletin 07-26-02, #15 Exhibit 38 - Technical Service Bulletin 09-10-02, #16 Exhibit 39 - Technical Exhibit 39 - Technical Service Bulletin 10-02-02Bulletin 10-02-02, #17 Exhibit 40 - Technical Service Bulletin 11-04-22, #18 Exhibit 41 - Technical Service Bulletin 11-12-4, #19 Exhibit 42 - Technical Service Bulletin 12-07-07, #20 Exhibit 43 - Technical Service Bulletin 12-12-10, #21 Exhibit 44 - Customer Satisfaction Program 08B07, #22 Exhibit 45 - Customer Satisfaction Program 08B06, #23 Exhibit 46 - Fords Requests for Production Nos. 6-10, #24 Exhibit 47 Redacted Bates Number 1257 Produced By Ford On March 8, 2021, #25 Exhibit 48 Redacted Bates Number 1298 Produced By Ford On March 8, 2021, #26 Exhibit 49 Redacted Bates Number 1303 Produced By Ford On March 8, 2021)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 65 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. correcting Objection/Opposition (Motion related),,,,,,, #51 Notice of Errata re Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski in Opposition to Ford Motor Company's Motion for Summary Judgment [DKT#54-1] (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 64 Text Entry Order: Plaintiffs Application for an Order to File Under Seal Exhibits 47, 48, and 49 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowksi in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, filed March 15, 2021 (Docket No. #53 ), and Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski in Support of Application for an Order to File Under Seal Exhibits 47, 48, and 49 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski in Support of Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, filed March 15, 2021 (Docket No. #54 ), violate paragraph 9 of the Courts Standing Order and are hereby STRICKEN. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 63
ORDER REGARDING EXHIBITS: Although counsel has adequately described the exhibits attached to the Declaration of Sabrina Narain, filed on March 8, 2021 (Docket No. #40 ); the Declaration of Rocio Barbeaux, filed March 9, 2021 (Docket No. #41 ); the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, filed March 15, 2021 (Docket No. #51 ) in the declarations, counsel has failed to adequately describe those exhibits on the docket. Similarly, although counsel has adequately described the exhibits attached to Plaintiffs Notice of Supplemental Authority and/or Request for Judicial Notice in Opposition to Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion for Summary Judgment, filed March 15, 2021 (Docket No. #52 -1) (Request forJudicial Notice), in the Request for Judicial Notice, counsel has failed to adequately describe those exhibits on the docket. Accordingly, counsel shall re-file the declarations and Request for Judicial Notice, and shallseparately docket each exhibit and include a meaningful description of each exhibit by March 17, 2021. (sr)
|
| Filing 62 DECLARATION of Daniel Kalinowski Regarding Filing of Plaintiff's Opposition and Supporting Papers to Defendant Ford Motor Company's Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 61 EXCERPTS FROM THE DEPOSITION OF GALPIN MOTORSS PERSON MOST QUALIFIED AND CTO AND VP OF INNOVATION ANDY GRAFF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell re: Objection/Opposition (Motion related),,,,,,, #51 (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 60 EXCERPTS FROM THE DEPOSITION OF GALPIN MOTORSS TECHNICIAN CESAR AGUILAR IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell re: Objection/Opposition (Motion related),,,,,,, #51 (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 59 EXCERPTS FROM THE TRIAL TESTIMONY OF MR. BRIEN FULTON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell re: Objection/Opposition (Motion related),,,,,,, #51 (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 58 Excerpts From The Deposition Of Sergio Segura In Support Of Plaintiffs Opposition To Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell re: Objection/Opposition (Motion related),,,,,,, #51 (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 57 Excerpts From The Deposition Of John Bruno In Support Of Plaintiffs Opposition To Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell re: Objection/Opposition (Motion related),,,,,,, #51 (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 56 Excerpts From The Deposition Of Galpin Motorss Service Advisor William Hernandes In Support Of Plaintiffs Opposition To Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell re: Objection/Opposition (Motion related),,,,,,, #51 (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 55 Excerpts From The Deposition Of Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan Odonnell In Support Of Plaintiffs Opposition To Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell re: Objection/Opposition (Motion related),,,,,,, #51 (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 54 *Stricken* SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document Exhibits 47, 48, And 49 To The Declaration Of Daniel Kalinowksi In Opposition To Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment under seal #53 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document Exhibit 47 to Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #2 Unredacted Document Exhibit 48 to Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #3 Unredacted Document Exhibit 49 to Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski)(Kalinowski, Daniel) Modified on 3/16/2021 (sr). |
| Filing 53 *Stricken* APPLICATION to file document Exhibits 47, 48, And 49 To The Declaration Of Daniel Kalinowksi In Opposition To Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment under seal filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 47 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski (Redacted), #2 Exhibit 48 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski (Redacted), #3 Exhibit 49 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #4 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Application for an Order to File Under Seal Exhibits 47, 48, And 49 To The Declaration Of Daniel Kalinowksi In Opposition To Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment)(Kalinowski, Daniel) Modified on 3/16/2021 (sr). |
| Filing 52 SUPPLEMENT to Opposition re Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt No. 39] filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiffs Notice Of Supplemental Authority And/Or Request For Judicial Notice In Opposition To Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion For Summary Judgment, #2 Exhibit 50 to Plaintiffs Notice Of Supplemental Authority And/Or Request For Judicial Notice In Opposition To Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion For Summary Judgment, #3 Exhibit 51 to Plaintiffs Notice Of Supplemental Authority And/Or Request For Judicial Notice In Opposition To Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion For Summary Judgment, #4 Exhibit 52 to Plaintiffs Notice Of Supplemental Authority And/Or Request For Judicial Notice In Opposition To Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion For Summary Judgment, #5 Exhibit 53 to Plaintiffs Notice Of Supplemental Authority And/Or Request For Judicial Notice In Opposition To Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion For Summary Judgment, #6 Exhibit 54 to Plaintiffs Notice Of Supplemental Authority And/Or Request For Judicial Notice In Opposition To Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion For Summary Judgment, #7 Exhibit 55 to Plaintiffs Notice Of Supplemental Authority And/Or Request For Judicial Notice In Opposition To Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion For Summary Judgment, #8 Exhibit 56 to Plaintiffs Notice Of Supplemental Authority And/Or Request For Judicial Notice In Opposition To Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion For Summary Judgment, #9 Exhibit 57 to Plaintiffs Notice Of Supplemental Authority And/Or Request For Judicial Notice In Opposition To Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion For Summary Judgment, #10 Exhibit 58 to Plaintiffs Notice Of Supplemental Authority And/Or Request For Judicial Notice In Opposition To Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion For Summary Judgment)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 51 OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #39 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #2 Exhibit 24 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #3 Exhibit 25 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #4 Exhibit 26 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #5 Exhibit 27 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #6 Exhibit 28 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #7 Exhibit 29 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #8 Exhibit 30 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #9 Exhibit 31 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #10 Exhibit 32 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #11 Exhibit 33 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #12 Exhibit 34 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #13 Exhibit 35 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #14 Exhibit 36 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #15 Exhibit 37 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #16 Exhibit 38 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #17 Exhibit 39 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #18 Exhibit 40 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #19 Exhibit 41 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #20 Exhibit 42 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #21 Exhibit 43 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #22 Exhibit 44 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #23 Exhibit 45 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #24 Exhibit 46 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #25 Exhibit 47 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski (Redacted), #26 Exhibit 48 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski (Redacted), #27 Exhibit 49 to the Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 50 Text Entry Order: In light of the parties inability to meet the deadlines set by the Courts Scheduling and Case Management Order, filed March 6, 2020 (Docket No. #15 ), counsel shall meet and confer either in person or via video by March 16, 2021, and consider entering into a stipulation to remand this action to Los Angeles Superior Court. The parties shall file their stipulation or joint statement that the parties met and conferred but were unable to agree on a stipulation by March 17, 2021.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 48 OPPOSITION re: First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Relief from APPLICATION REQUESTING RELIEF OF FROM THE COURTS SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCLOSURES #44 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 47 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANYS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RELATED DATES AND MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER #45 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
|
Filing 49
ORDER DENYING CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER #45 by Judge John F. Walter. DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT. (iv)
|
| Filing 46 NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Defendant re First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Relief from APPLICATION REQUESTING RELIEF OF FROM THE COURTS SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCLOSURES #44 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS EX PARTE APPLICATION REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM THE COURTS SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCLOSURES)(Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 45 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANYS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RELATED DATES AND MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Order) (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 44 First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Relief from APPLICATION REQUESTING RELIEF OF FROM THE COURTS SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCLOSURES filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Attorney Declaration In Support of Ex Parte Application, #2 Declaration Declaration of Tammy Scovill In Support of Ex Parte Application)(Sanders, Justin) |
|
Filing 43
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c) [filed 2/9/21; Docket No. #27 ] by Judge John F. Walter. The Court continues the hearing on Defendant Ford Motor Company' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c), currently scheduled for March 15, 2021, at 1:30 p.m., to April 5, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. (iv)
|
| Filing 42 STIPULATION to Continue Hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 41 DECLARATION of Rocio Barbeaux DECLARATION OF ROCIO BARBEAUX REGARDING FILING FORD MOTOR COMPANYS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #39 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 40 DECLARATION of Sabrina Narain In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment #39 with Exhibits filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 39 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company. Motion set for hearing on 4/5/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Statement of Facts, #3 proposed Order, #4 Notice of Lodging, #5 Proposed Judgment) (Sanders, Justin) |
|
Filing 38
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo re Stipulation for Protective Order #37 . (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 37 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 36 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) OF TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE RE: THE PARTIES' DISCOVERY DISPUTE CONCERNING PROTECTIVE ORDER RECORD KEEPING held before Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. The Court heard from counsel for both parties regarding the dispute. The parties reached a tentative agreement about how Plaintiff is to keep track of those who come into contact with confidential documents but will continue communications between themselves in an attempt to resolve this dispute. The Court encourages the parties to attempt to resolve this issue. Court Recorder: AT&T 3/01/21. (hr) |
| Filing 35 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Judgment on the Pleadings #27 (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Statement of Decision Regarding Defendant Ford Motor Companys Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 34 STATEMENT of [PROPOSED] STATEMENT OF DECISION REGARDING FORD MOTOR COMPANYS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Judgment on the Pleadings #27 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 33 STATEMENT JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING MEET AND CONFER EFFORTS PRIOR TO FILING FORD MOTOR COMPANYS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 32 FORD MOTOR COMPANYS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 objections to Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice)(Sanders, Justin) |
|
Filing 31
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING INFORMAL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE RE: THE PARTIES' DISCOVERY DISPUTE CONCERNING PROTECTIVE ORDER RECORD KEEPING by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. The Court hereby sets an informal telephonic discovery conference on this dispute for Monday, March 1, 2021, at 11 a.m. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
|
Filing 30
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DEADLINE #29 by Judge John F. Walter. The Court's Scheduling and Case Management Order dated March 6, 2020 is amended so that the discovery cut- off deadline is extended to April 15, 2021. (iv)
|
| Filing 29 STIPULATION to Extend Discovery Cut-Off Date to April 15, 2021 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 28 OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Judgment on the Pleadings #27 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan O'Donnell. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #2 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Opposition to Defendant Ford Motor Company's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, #3 Exhibit 1 to Request for Judicial Notice)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Motion set for hearing on 3/15/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES ISO MSJP, #2 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE ISO MSJP, #3 PROPOSED ORDER) (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 26 (IN CHAMBERS) MINUTES RE: TELEPHONIC DISCOVERY CONFERENCE HELD ON FEBRUARY 3, 2021 held before Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. On February 3, 2021, the Court held a telephonic conference to discuss the parties' discovery disputes regarding the scope of categories and areas of examination of Defendant's Person Most Knowledgeable ("PMK") at a future deposition, as well as various discovery requests, including requests for production of documents served on Defendant by Plaintiff. With the Court's guidance, the parties were able to reach tentative agreements on these disputes. (see document for further details) Court Recorder: AT&T 2/03/21. (hr) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT A REVISED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, re Stipulation for Protective Order #23 . The parties may submit a revised Stipulation and [Proposed] Protective Order for the Court's consideration. The parties are encouraged to use the model stipulated protective order found in Judge Castillo's page on the Court's website. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 24 DECLARATION of DECLARATION OF SABRINA C. NARAIN IN RESPONSE TO JANUARY 25, 2021 COURT ORDER REGARDING FORD MOTOR COMPANYS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS re Text Only Scheduling Notice,,,, 20 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 23 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan ODonnell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 22 DECLARATION of Daniel Kalinowski re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, #21 Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski in Response to Court's January 25, 2021 Order Regarding Defendant Ford Motor Company's Stricken Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan ODonnell. (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
|
Filing 21
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE ON THE PARTIES' ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY DISPUTES by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. The Court hereby sets a Telephonic Conference for Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. Counsel are ordered to be present. The Courtroom Deputy Clerk will send instructions to the parties via email for calling into the Telephonic Conference. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 20 Text Entry Order: Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan ODonnells Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c), filed on January 22, 2021 (Docket No. #19 ), is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Local Rule 7-3, which requires the conference of counsel to take place at least seven days prior to the filing of the Motion, and paragraph 5(b) of the Court's Standing Order, which requires the Joint Statement to be filed three days after the Local Rule 7-3 Conference. If Plaintiff wishes to re-file the Motion, counsel shall meet and confer in person or via video conference by January 29, 2021. If the parties cannot resolve the issues raised in the Motion, within 3 days of the meet and confer, each party shall file a declaration setting forth the issues resolved at the conference and those issues that were not resolved with a detailed explanation of why those issues could not be resolved. If a Motion remains necessary, it shall not be filed until 2 days after each party files the declaration required by this Order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 19 *Stricken* NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to on the Pleadings filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Request for Judicial Notice ISO Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings) (Sanders, Justin) Modified on 1/25/2021 (sr). |
| Filing 18 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report Regarding Mediation filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan ODonnell. (Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel Max Kalinowski counsel for Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan ODonnell. Adding Daniel Kalinowski as counsel of record for Plaintiff for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan ODonnell. (Attorney Daniel Max Kalinowski added to party Jeffrey Allan ODonnell(pty:pla))(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Bryan C. Altman on behalf of Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan ODonnell. Filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan ODonnell (Attorney Bryan C Altman added to party Jeffrey Allan ODonnell(pty:pla))(Altman, Bryan) |
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 5/21/2021 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 5/28/2021 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 6/8/2021 at 8:30 AM. (iv)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on March 16, 2020 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties' Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: December 14, 2020. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: December 18, 2020. (iv)
|
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10-12 Days, filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Allan ODonnell.. (Mikhov, Steve) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.(Sanders, Justin) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for March 16, 2020 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before March 2, 2020. (iv)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case transferred from Judge John A. Kronstadt to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:20-cv-01095 JFW(PVCx). (rn)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error docket item 3 was issued in error Re: Terminate Attorney Civil Case Opening, #3 . **Please disregard docket item 3** (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
| Filing 3 In response to the opening of this case, the Clerk issued a Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Attorney Case Opening. The Notice indicated that unless counsel corrected the identified discrepancy within two business days, the docket for this case number would be closed and no further filings would be permitted under this case number. Counsel has not corrected the discrepancy. Accordingly, this case is now closed. No further filings may be made under this case number, except, if applicable, to request a refund of fees using a Form G-124, Application for Refund of Fees. Should you wish to pursue this action, a new case must be filed and a new case number issued. (Case Terminated.) (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: APPLICATION for Removal of Notice of Removal. #1 . The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Jeffrey Allan ODonnell. Filed in state Court on 4/29/19 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit D to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Jeffrey Allan ODonnell pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) With prejudice as to Galpin Motors, Inc. Filed in state Court on 8/5/19 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Removal of Notice of Removal. filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sabrina Narain, #2 Civil Cover Sheet cv-71) (Attorney Justin H Sanders added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft)) (Sanders, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
