Darrel Dressel v. Ken Rubman et al
Darrel Dressel |
Ken Rubman, Miami Beach Realty, LLC, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them and Miami Beach Realty, LLC doing business as Keller Williams Miami Beach Realty |
2:2020cv01143 |
February 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
George H Wu |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Miami Beach Realty, LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ken Rubman. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Darrel Dressel, (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Darrel Dressel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Darrel Dressel. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25259548 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Darrel Dressel. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Darrel Dressel(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.