Jong Ja Kim v. Hairbedian Khatchik et al
| JONG JA KIM |
| HAIRBEDIAN KHATCHIK, DOES 1 through 10 and Hairbedian Khatchik doing business as Mobil Gas Station |
| 2:2020cv01185 |
| February 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Jong Ja Kim. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Hairbedian Khatchik. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JONG JA KIM, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JONG JA KIM. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JONG JA KIM. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25268415 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff JONG JA KIM. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party JONG JA KIM(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
