Robert Bryce Stewart III v. The Kraft Heinz Company et al
Plaintiff: Robert Bryce Stewart, III
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Kraft Heinz Ingredients Corp. and The Kraft Heinz Company
Case Number: 2:2020cv01209
Filed: February 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E McDermott
Referring Judge: Virginia A Phillips
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #15 , by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: Good cause appearing therefor, the Court APPROVES the Stipulation and EXTENDS Defendants' deadline to file a responsive pleading until April 15, 2020. (bm)
March 27, 2020 Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kraft Heinz Ingredients Corp. answer now due 4/15/2020; The Kraft Heinz Company answer now due 4/15/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Kraft Heinz Ingredients Corp.; The Kraft Heinz Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Spelman, Kate)
March 5, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Robert Bryce Stewart, III. Related Case(s): 2:19-cv-10658-DSF-SK (Nathan, Reuben)
February 24, 2020 Filing 13 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Robert Bryce Stewart, III, upon Defendant Kraft Heinz Ingredients Corp. served on 2/7/2020, answer due 3/27/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Nathan, Reuben)
February 21, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Kraft Heinz Ingredients Corp., identifying Kraft Heinz Company. (Spelman, Kate)
February 21, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Kraft Heinz Company, identifying Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. (Spelman, Kate)
February 21, 2020 Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kraft Heinz Ingredients Corp. answer now due 3/27/2020; The Kraft Heinz Company answer now due 3/27/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Kraft Heinz Ingredients Corp.; The Kraft Heinz Company.(Attorney Kate Spelman added to party Kraft Heinz Ingredients Corp.(pty:dft), Attorney Kate Spelman added to party The Kraft Heinz Company(pty:dft))(Spelman, Kate)
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh)
February 6, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Robert Bryce Stewart, III, identifying Plaintiff, Robert Bryce Stewart III; Defendant, The Kraft Heinz Company; Defendant, Kraft Heinz Ingredients Corp.. (Nathan, Reuben)
February 6, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh)
February 6, 2020 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Kraft Heinz Ingredients Corp., The Kraft Heinz Company. (lh)
February 6, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
February 6, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh)
February 6, 2020 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Robert Bryce Stewart, III. (Nathan, Reuben)
February 6, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Robert Bryce Stewart, III. (Nathan, Reuben)
February 6, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25273238 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Robert Bryce Stewart, III. (Attorney Reuben D Nathan added to party Robert Bryce Stewart, III(pty:pla))(Nathan, Reuben)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robert Bryce Stewart III v. The Kraft Heinz Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Bryce Stewart, III
Represented By: Reuben D Nathan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kraft Heinz Ingredients Corp.
Represented By: Kate Spelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Kraft Heinz Company
Represented By: Kate Spelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?