Antonio Fernandez v. Joseph A. August et al
| Antonio Fernandez |
| Joesph A. August, Does 1-10, Beatriz Lares M.D., Inc. and Joseph A. August |
| 2:2020cv01234 |
| February 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 5/18/2020 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Beatriz Lares M.D., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Certification and NOtice of INterested Parties (Local Rule 7.101), #2 Affidavit Proof of Service)(Schramm, Richard) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Answer #10 , for the following reasons: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Other: Failure to comply with L.R. 5-4.5 Re: Mandatory Chambers. (bm)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
| Filing 10 DOCUMENT STRICKEN ON 3/5/20. ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Answer filed by Defendant Beatriz Lares M.D., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Richard Dean Schramm added to party Beatriz Lares M.D., Inc.(pty:dft))(Schramm, Richard) Modified on 3/5/2020 (bm). |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, upon Defendant Beatriz Lares M.D., Inc. served on 2/28/2020, answer due 3/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: Beatriz Lares in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Price, Dennis) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Joesph A. August, Joseph A. August, Beatriz Lares M.D., Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25278185 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
