Romar Tallie v. U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
| Romar Tallie |
| U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc., Which Will Do Business In California As USAPN, Inc. and U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv01298 |
| February 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Romar Tallie. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hart, Yana) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Romar Tallie, (Kazerounian, Seyed) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Romar Tallie. (Kazerounian, Seyed) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Romar Tallie. (Kazerounian, Seyed) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25290140 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Romar Tallie. (Attorney Seyed Abbas Kazerounian added to party Romar Tallie(pty:pla))(Kazerounian, Seyed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
