Elliot McGucken v. Linx Studio, Inc. et al
| ELLIOT MCGUCKEN |
| LINX STUDIO, INC., DOES 1-10, inclusive and Arthur Kamyshyan |
| 2:2020cv01339 |
| February 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: granting #17 REQUEST for Extension of Time to Answer. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: Defendants shall file a responsive pleading no later than May 2, 2020. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 17 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File Answer, REQUEST to Extend Time to File Answer to 5/2/2020 re Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Plaintiff Elliot McGucken. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Carreon, Ryan) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Elliot McGucken, upon Defendant Arthur Kamyshyan served on 3/12/2020, answer due 4/2/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon ARTHUR KAMYSHYAN in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carreon, Ryan) |
|
Filing 15
IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson - The Order to Show Cause #11 , issued on 03/04/2020, is DISCHARGED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #11 as to defendant Arthur Kamyshyan. (mrgo) |
|
Filing 14
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/18/2020. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Plaintiff Elliot McGucken. (Carreon, Ryan) |
| Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Does, Linx Studio, Inc., Arthur Kamyshyan amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Elliot McGucken (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D)(Carreon, Ryan) |
|
Filing 10
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Elliot McGucken, upon Defendant Linx Studio, Inc. served on 2/11/2020, answer due 3/3/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Becky De George, Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carreon, Ryan) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Linx Studio, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Plaintiff ELLIOT MCGUCKEN. (Carreon, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by ELLIOT MCGUCKEN. (Carreon, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff ELLIOT MCGUCKEN. (Carreon, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ELLIOT MCGUCKEN. (Carreon, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25296572 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff ELLIOT MCGUCKEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A - D) (Attorney Ryan E Carreon added to party ELLIOT MCGUCKEN(pty:pla))(Carreon, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
