Chris Langer v. Cheng Lung Hsiao et al
Chris Langer |
Cheng Lung Hsiao, Does 1-10 and Shing-Hua Pa |
2:2020cv01447 |
February 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
Ronald SW Lew |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S OSC RESPONSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION, #10 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and hereby DISMISSES Plaintiffs Unruh Act claim WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (shb) |
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Scheduling Conference set for 5/26/2020 at 10:00 AM. See order for complete details. (jre) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Cheng Lung Hsiao, Shing-Hua Pa, identifying Cheng Lung Hsiao and Shing-Hua Pa. (Chong, Robert) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Cheng Lung Hsiao, Shing-Hua Pa.(Chong, Robert) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Shing-Hua Pa answer now due 3/31/2020; Cheng Lung Hsiao answer now due 3/31/2020, filed by Defendant Shing-Hua Pa; Cheng Lung Hsiao.(Attorney Robert W Chong added to party Cheng Lung Hsiao(pty:dft), Attorney Robert W Chong added to party Shing-Hua Pa(pty:dft))(Chong, Robert) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Shing-Hua Pa served on 2/18/2020, answer due 3/10/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Price, Dennis) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Cheng Lung Hsiao served on 2/18/2020, answer due 3/10/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Price, Dennis) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Chris Langerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of service)(Handy, Russell) |
Filing 9 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EXERCISE OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION RE STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than February 21, 2020. See order for more details. (shb) |
Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation (early mediation and stay program). (jre) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Cheng Lung Hsiao, Shing-Hua Pa. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (esa) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25317854 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Chris Langer(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.