In Re: Ivan Rene Moore
| Ivan Rene Moore |
| Ronald Hills and Devra Allen |
| 2:2020cv01450 |
| February 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (lh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL (ADVERSARY) prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 2/11/2020. (lh) |
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION: Re: Order Granting in Part Motion of Homer Blow, Courier Communication Corporation dba Wnov Radio Station, Jerrel Jones, Urban Marketing Group LLC, Milwaukee Courier Inc., Ernestine Jones, Sandra Robinson-Jones, Sherwin Hughes, New Pitts Mortuary LLC and Michelle Luckett Pitts to Dismiss Complaint entered on 1/30/2020 by Bankruptcy Judge Martin R. Barash, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 2/11/2020. Bankruptcy Court case number: 1:17-bk-12071-MB, Adversary number: 1:17-ap-01089-MB, BAP case number: None., filed by Appellant Ivan Rene Moore. (Attachments: #1 USBC Docket) (lh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
