Vivian Yamaguchi v. California Highway Patrol et al
Vivian Yamaguchi |
Mark Shaw, April Baxter, Does 1 through 100, Joe Zizi, Patrick Kimball and California Highway Patrol |
Defendants California Highway Patrol, Plaintiff Vivian Yamaguchi and Kenneth C. Jones |
2:2020cv01564 |
February 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
John F Walter |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Vivian Yamaguchi Dismissal of Defendant April Baxter only (Rosenblit, Joseph) |
Filing 12 Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Vivian Yamaguchi Dismissal of Defendant April Baxter only (Rosenblit, Joseph) |
Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jaclyn V Younger counsel for Defendant April Baxter. Adding Jaclyn v. Younger as counsel of record for April Baxter for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant April Baxter. (Attorney Jaclyn V Younger added to party April Baxter(pty:dft))(Younger, Jaclyn) |
Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by plaintiff Vivian Yamaguchi (Rosenblit, Joseph) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter.The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 10/30/2020 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for hearing on 11/6/2020 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 11/17/2020 at 8:30 AM. (iv) |
Filing 8 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on March 23, 2020 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties' Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: July 6, 2020. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: July 10, 2020. (iv) |
Filing 7 Joint Rule 26(f) Report filed by Defendants April Baxter, California Highway Patrol, Does, Patrick Kimball, Mark Shaw, Joe Zizi re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only,, #6 (Jones, Kenneth) |
Filing 6 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for March 23, 2020 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before March 13, 2020. (iv) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (car) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): The Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately and in the correct event category located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings.. (car) |
FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-25397737 for $400 filing fee. (Jones, Kenneth) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants April Baxter, California Highway Patrol, Does 1 through 100, Patrick Kimball, Mark Shaw, Joe Zizi, filed by Plaintiff Vivian Yamaguchi. Filed in state Court on 1/23/2020 Submitted with Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 20STCV03136 Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Defendants Kenneth C. Jones, California Highway Patrol. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Kenneth Charles Jones added to party California Highway Patrol(pty:bkmov), Attorney Kenneth Charles Jones added to party Kenneth C. Jones(pty:bkmov))(Jones, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.