PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. Designerbrandsforless, Inc. et al
| PRL USA Holdings, Inc. |
| DOES 1-10, inclusive, Designerbrandsforless, Inc., Jacqueline Jarrot, P Star T, Inc., dba Pacific Star and Haim Ohayon |
| Diane Faber |
| 2:2020cv01670 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 82
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE TO DEFENDANTS DESIGNERBRANDSFORLESS, INC. AND JACQUELINE JARROT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court GRANTS the parties' Stipulation #81 . Defendants, including all its agents, servants, successors and assigns, is permanently restrained and enjoined re the Ralph Lauren Trademarks, etc. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs associated with the action with neither Party deemed as the prevailing party. Except as otherwise provided herein, Defendants Designerbrandsforless, Inc. and Jacqueline Jarrot are hereby dismissed with prejudice. See document for further details. (gk)
|
| Filing 81 STIPULATION for Permanent Injunction as to DEFENDANTS DESIGNERBRANDSFORLESS, INC. AND JACQUELINE JARROT filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 79 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Settlement #78 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
|
Filing 80
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONSUMMATE SETTLEMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The parties have notified the Court that they are still working on consummating their settlement and would like to extend the deadline to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated, by 30 days #78 . The Court hereby EXTENDS the deadline to re-open the action by 30 days, to 8/31/2022. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 78 Joint STIPULATION for Settlement TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO CONSUMMATE SETTLEMENT filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc..(Fountain, Jamie) |
|
Filing 77
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION #76 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court has been advised that this action has been settled. The Court therefore ORDERS that this action is hereby DISMISSED without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
| Filing 76 NOTICE of Settlement AND JOINT REQUEST TO STAY ALL DEADLINES FOR THIRTY (30) DAYS filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Fountain, Jamie) |
|
Filing 75
ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' STIPULATION TO: (1) SET DEFENDANT DESIGNERBRANDSFORLESS, INC.'S FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION AFTER THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF; AND (2) EXTEND THE MOTION HEARING CUTOFF DATE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation #74 , the Court hereby ORDERS that the non-expert discovery cutoff date is extended to 6/29/2022, though only for discovery related to Plaintiff's Second Amended Notice of Deposition of Defendant DesignerBrandsForLess, Inc. ("DBFL") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). Defendant DBFL is ORDERED to appear at its deposition on 6/29/2022, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). The motion hearing cutoff date is extended to 8/19/2022. All other non-expert discovery remains subject to the 6/24/2022 discovery cutoff date. (gk)
|
| Filing 74 Joint STIPULATION for Discovery as to 1) SET DEFENDANT DESIGNERBRANDSFORLESS, INCS FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION AFTER THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF; AND 2) EXTEND THE MOTION HEARING CUTOFF filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fountain, Jamie) |
|
Filing 73
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver re Stipulation for Protective Order #72 (dml)
|
| Filing 72 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc..(Fountain, Jamie) |
|
Filing 71
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, WITH PREJUDICE, OF DEFENDANTS P STAR T, INC. AND HAIM OHAYON by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court hereby GRANTS the Stipulation with respect to Defendants P Star T, Inc. and Haim Ohayon #68 . It is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants, including all its agents, servants, successors, and assigns, are permanently restrained and enjoined re RALPH LAUREN Trademarks, etc. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs associated with the action, with neither Party deemed as the prevailing party. Defendants P Star T, Inc. and Haim Ohayon are hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice. (gk)
|
| Filing 70 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Clerk RE: Stipulation filed 3/31/2022 #68 . Counsel shall immediately file a Proposed Order and email a Microsoft Word version of the Proposed Order to the chambers email address. (gk) |
| Filing 69 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Permanent Injunction #68 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 68 STIPULATION for Permanent Injunction as to Stipulation to Entry of Permanent Injunction and Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice to Defendants P Star T, Inc. and Haim Ohayon filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc..(Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 67 NOTICE of Change of address by Bryan C Altman attorney for Defendants Designerbrandsforless, Inc., Jacqueline Jarrot. Changing attorneys address to Bryan C. Altman, The Altman Law Group, 10990 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 220, Los Angeles, CA 90024. Filed by Defendants Designerbrandsforless, Inc., Jacqueline Jarrot. (Altman, Bryan) |
| Filing 66 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Diane Faber has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst) |
| Filing 65 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Diane L. Faber may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 12/17/2021 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.(Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 64 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brent H Blakely counsel for Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. Mark S. Zhai is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Blakely, Brent) |
| Filing 63 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, #41 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by defendants Haim Ohayon, P Star T, Inc., dba Pacific Star.(Steiner, Leonard) |
|
Filing 62
ORDER RE: JURY/COURT TRIAL: I. SCHEDULE; II. TRIAL PREPARATION; III. CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Jury Trial set for 11/8/2022 08:30 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions In Limine set for 10/21/2022 11:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Last Date to Hear Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties 1/14/2022. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 6/24/2022. Last Date to Hear Motions 7/22/2022. Deadline to Complete Settlement Conference 8/12/2022. Trial Filings (first round): Motions In Limine, Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law, Witness Lists, Joint Exhibit List, Joint Status Report Regarding Settlement due by 9/30/2022. Trial Filings (second round): Oppositions to Motions In Limine, Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order due by 10/7/2022. See document for further details. (gk)
|
|
Filing 61
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 8/12/2022. (cb)
|
|
Filing 60
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the September 24, 2021, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 59
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS P START, INC. AND HAIM OHAYON'S MOTION TO DISMISS #54 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. See document for details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 58 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 6 days, filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc... (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 57 REPLY Reply in support of motion NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss first amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) #54 filed by Defendants Haim Ohayon, P Star T, Inc., dba Pacific Star. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Steiner, Leonard) |
| Filing 56 OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss first amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) #54 filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Jamie Fountain)(Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 55 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss first amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) #54 . The following error(s) was/were found: Lacking statement re conference of counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3. Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 54 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss first amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) filed by defendants Haim Ohayon, P Star T, Inc., dba Pacific Star. Motion set for hearing on 9/17/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Unredacted Document) (Steiner, Leonard) |
| Filing 53 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Haim Ohayon answer now due 8/20/2021; P Star T, Inc., dba Pacific Star answer now due 8/20/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days) #52 filed by defendants Haim Ohayon; P Star T, Inc., dba Pacific Star.(Steiner, Leonard) |
| Filing 52 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to August 13, 2021 re Amended Complaint/Petition, #41 filed by Defendants PRL USA Holdings, Inc..(Attorney Leonard Steiner added to party PRL USA Holdings, Inc.(pty:pla))(Steiner, Leonard) |
| Filing 51 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc., upon Defendant Haim Ohayon served on 7/19/2021, answer due 8/9/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Steffen Lacy, Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 50 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc., upon Defendant P Star T, Inc., dba Pacific Star served on 7/15/2021, answer due 8/5/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Steffen Lacy, Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 49 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brent H Blakely counsel for Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. Colby Ann Meagle is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Blakely, Brent) |
| Filing 48 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Designerbrandsforless, Inc., Jacqueline Jarrot, (Altman, Bryan) |
| Filing 47 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Answer to Complaint #44 by Clerk. Per Local Rule 7.1-1, counsel shall immediately file the Certificate of Interested Parties. (lom) Modified on 6/28/2021 (lom). |
| Filing 46 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #44 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
|
Filing 45
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 9/24/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 44 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, #41 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Designerbrandsforless, Inc., Jacqueline Jarrot.(Attorney Bryan C Altman added to party Jacqueline Jarrot(pty:dft))(Altman, Bryan) |
| Filing 43 21-Day Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #41 as to Defendants Jacqueline Jarrot, P Star T, Inc. dba Pacific Star. (gk) |
| Filing 42 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #41 filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Blakely, Brent) |
| Filing 41 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Designerbrandsforless, Inc., Does, Jacqueline Jarrot, P Star T, Inc., dba Pacific Star, Haim Ohayon amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.(Blakely, Brent) |
|
Filing 40
ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES STIPULATION TO: (1) SET ASIDE DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT DESIGNERBRANDSFORLESS, INC.; (2) ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS DESIGNERBRANDSFORLESS, INC. AND JACQUELINE JARROT; AND (3) FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation between Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc. ("PRL") and Defendant DesignerBrandsForLess, Inc. ("DBFL") #39 , the case is hereby REOPENED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Default #21 , Default Judgment #29 , and Permanent Injunction #31 entered against Defendant DBFL is hereby set aside. A preliminary injunction shall be entered against Defendant DesignerBrandsForLess, Inc. and against Jacqueline Jarrot re the Ralph Lauren Trademarks, etc. Plaintiff shall file its First Amended Complaint within five days. The First Amended Complaint shall be deemed served upon Defendants DesignerBrandsForLess, Inc. and Jacqueline Jarrot. Defendant DesignerBrandsForLess, Inc. and Jacqueline Jarrot shall file a Responsive pleading within 30 days of the date this stipulation is approved. See document for further details. (Case reopened. MD JS-5.) (gk)
|
| Filing 39 STIPULATION to Set Aside Default as to DesignerBrandsForLess, Inc., STIPULATION for Preliminary Injunction as to DesignerBrandsForLess, Inc. and Jacqueline Jarrot, STIPULATION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Jamie Fountain added to party PRL USA Holdings, Inc.(pty:pla))(Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 38 Notice of Electronic Filing re Text Only Bounced Notice of Electronic Filing E-mail,, 37 e-mailed to Colby Ann Meagle at cmeagle@blakelylawgroup.com bounced due to Invalid email address. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ir) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 37 Notice of Electronic Filing re Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form #36 , Notice of Withdrawal #35 e-mailed to Diba Alemi at dalemi@thegallagherlawgroup.com bounced due to Invalid email address. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ir) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 36 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Clerk RE: Defendant's Motion filed 4/1/2021 #33 . The document is stricken. (gk) |
| Filing 35 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Set Aside Default, #33 filed by Defendant Designerbrandsforless, Inc.. (Altman, Bryan) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Set Aside Default Re: Order on Motion for Default Judgment,,, #29 . #33 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 33 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS ON 4/2/2021, SEE DOCKET NO. 36] NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Set Aside Default Re: Order on Motion for Default Judgment,,, #29 . filed by Defendant Designerbrandsforless, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Chris Urner, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Attorney Bryan C Altman added to party Designerbrandsforless, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Altman, Bryan) Modified on 4/5/2021 (gk). |
| Filing 32 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Judgment Entering Permanent Injunction and Awarding Statutory Damages and Prejudgment Interest) (gk) |
|
Filing 31
[DOCUMENT SET ASIDE PER ORDER ON 5/19/2021, SEE DOCKET NO. 40] JUDGMENT ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION, AND AWARDING STATUTORY DAMAGES AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AGAINST DEFENDANT DESIGNERBRANDSFORLESS, INC. by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: On 10/29/2020, the Court granted Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.'s ("PLR") motion for default judgment #24 . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED: Judgment is entered against Defendant Designerbrandsforless, Inc. as to Counts 1-4 of Plaintiff's Complaint. The Court awards Plaintiff $410,783.56 (consisting of statutory damages in the amount of $400,000.00 and $10,783.56 in prejudgment interest) against Designerbrandsforless, Inc. Defendant, its officers, agents, servants and employees and any persons in active concert or participation with them are permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon Plaintiff's federally registered trademarks. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk) Modified on 5/20/2021 (gk).
|
| Filing 30 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of Proposed Judgment re Order on Motion for Default Judgment,,, #29 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Judgment)(Blakely, Brent) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. granting #24 MOTION for Default Judgment: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion and enters default judgment in Plaintiff's favor. The Court awards Plaintiff $410,783.56 (consisting of statutory damages in the amount of $400,000.00 and $10,783.56 in prejudgment interest) and against Defendant Designerbrandsforless, Inc IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant, its officers, agents, servants and employees and any persons in active concert or participation with them are permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon Plaintiff's federally registered trademarks, including but not limited the marks identified in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "RALPH LAUREN Trademarks"), either directly or contributorily in any manner, including: (see document for further details) (bm)
|
| Filing 28 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc., re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendant DESIGNERBRANDSFORLESS, INC. #24 served on 10/14/20. (Zhai, Mark) |
| Filing 27 RENEWED [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT re: Text Only Scheduling Notice,,, 26 (Blakely, Brent) |
|
Filing 26
(IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Local Rule 7-20 requires the moving party to file with any motion a [Proposed] Order granting the Motion that the Court may adopt. See also Local Rule 52-4.1. While Plaintiff has provided a [Proposed] Order (Dkt. No. 24-2), the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to file a renewed [Proposed] Order granting its Motion with additional detail. Specifically, the Proposed Order shall address the merits of the Motion, including a factual recitation, Plaintiffs satisfaction of Local Rule 55-1, the factors set forth in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1986), and the relief requested. Plaintiff is also ORDERED to email the Word version of the Proposed Order to the Courtroom Deputy Clerk via AB_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. The Proposed Order must be filed and emailed no later than September 30, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 25 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On August 25, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff has filed a response to the Order to Show Cause re Lack of Prosecution on September 8, 2020. The Court deems that response satisfactory, and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendant DESIGNERBRANDSFORLESS, INC. filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/30/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark Zhai, #2 Proposed Order) (Zhai, Mark) |
|
Filing 23
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 9/8/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Plaintiff(s) obtained entry of default as to Defendant(s) Designerbrandsforless, Inc., pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), but Plaintiff(s) have not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 22 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On July 13, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff has filed a response to the Order to Show Cause re Lack of Prosecution on July 20, 2020. The Court deems that response satisfactory, and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 21 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Designerbrandsforless, Inc. (gk) |
| Filing 20 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Designerbrandsforless, Inc. filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Zhai, Mark) |
|
Filing 19
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 7/20/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant(s) Designerbrandsforless, Inc. did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND GRANTING STIPULATION FOR THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Having considered Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.'s written response Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause ("OSC") re Dismissal #16 , and the Third Stipulation for an Extension of Time #17 , the Court hereby DISCHARGES the OSC #15 and ORDERS that Defendant Designerbrandsforless, Inc. shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before 7/3/2020. (gk)
|
| Filing 17 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to July 3, 2020 re Order,, Order Extending Answer Due Deadline, #14 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zhai, Mark) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,,, #15 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark S. Zhai, #2 Proposed Order)(Zhai, Mark) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 6/2/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant(s) Designerbrandsforless, Inc. did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation #13 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Designerbrandsforless, Inc. shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before 5/17/2020. The Order to Show Cause #12 is discharged. (gk)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Designerbrandsforless, Inc. answer now due 5/17/2020, filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Blakely, Brent) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 5/5/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Designerbrandsforless, Inc. answer now due 4/17/2020, filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc..(Blakely, Brent) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc., upon Defendant Designerbrandsforless, Inc. served on 2/27/2020, answer due 3/19/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Noel "Doe", Person In Charge/Authorized in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Blakely, Brent) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Designerbrandsforless, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Blakely, Brent) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc., (Blakely, Brent) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Blakely, Brent) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Blakely, Brent) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25436271 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. (Attorney Brent H Blakely added to party PRL USA Holdings, Inc.(pty:pla))(Blakely, Brent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
