Walter Hill v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
| Walter Hill |
| Union Pacific Railroad Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company and Does 1-50, Inclusive |
| 2:2020cv01694 |
| February 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/15/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 6/22/2020 at 9:00 am. (sw)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-01694 RGK(AFMx). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company identifying Union Pacific Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Sandoval, Melissa) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company, identifying Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Sandoval, Melissa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption on the document uploaded to the docket entry number referenced above does not match the case information on the docket (e.g., case title, case number, document name, etc.). The Court may 1)order an amended or corrected document to be filed, 2)order the document stricken, or 3)take other action the Court deems appropriate. You may file a Notice of Errata attaching a corrected version of the document, but you are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Corporation. (Sandoval, Melissa) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Corporation.(Sandoval, Melissa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 20STCV01600 Receipt No: ACACDC-25452466 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Corporation. (Attorney Melissa Ann Sandoval added to party Union Pacific Railroad Corporation(pty:dft))(Sandoval, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
