EQR-Marina Del Rey-1, LP v. Urioste et al
Plaintiff: EQR-Marina Del Rey-1, LP
Defendant: Luis Urioste and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv01701
Filed: February 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2020 Filing 10 Receipt of acknowledgment letter from Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, West District, Santa Monica, CA 90401. Case No. 19SMUD02435. (bm)
March 2, 2020 Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, West District. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, West District. (gk)
March 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, Case Number 19SMUD02435, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) (gk)
March 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Denying #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby REMANDED to state court. IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Reasons: District Court lacks jurisdiction. Case improperly removed from state court. Unlawful detainer action. Recommend remand. (gk)
February 21, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
February 21, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (et)
February 21, 2020 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Luis Urioste. (et)
February 21, 2020 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Luis Urioste. (et)
February 21, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA for the County of Los Angeles, case number 19SMUD02435 with CONFORMED E-FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee, Discovery to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott., filed by Defendant Luis Urioste. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EQR-Marina Del Rey-1, LP v. Urioste et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luis Urioste
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EQR-Marina Del Rey-1, LP
Represented By: Frederick L Spinrad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?