Roberta Anderson v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Roberta Anderson
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2020cv01702
Filed: February 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2020 Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Lynn M Harada added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Harada, Lynn)
April 7, 2020 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Roberta Anderson, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 4/7/2020, answer due 8/5/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Aghai, Sima)
February 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, re Procedures in Social Security Appeal. (mba)
February 25, 2020 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (mba)
February 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: Granting #5 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (mba)
February 25, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil)
February 21, 2020 Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Roberta Anderson. (Aghai, Sima)
February 21, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Roberta Anderson, (Aghai, Sima)
February 21, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Roberta Anderson. (Aghai, Sima)
February 21, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Roberta Anderson. (Aghai, Sima)
February 21, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by plaintiff Roberta Anderson. (Attorney Sima G Aghai added to party Roberta Anderson(pty:pla))(Aghai, Sima)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberta Anderson v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Lynn M Harada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roberta Anderson
Represented By: Sima G Aghai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?