Andy Chang v. Conn Shrader et al
Andy Chang |
Assistant Secretary Carl C. Risch, Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, Attorney General William P. Barr, Director Conn Shrader, U.S. Department of State, Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo, Michael R. Pompeo, Conn Shrader, Carl C. Risch, William P. Barr and Chad F. Wolf |
2:2020cv01722 |
February 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Gail J Standish |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Chad F. Wolf, Michael R. Pompeo, Carl C. Risch, William P. Barr, Conn Shrader, U.S. Department of State.(Attorney Margaret Ming Chen added to party William P. Barr(pty:dft), Attorney Margaret Ming Chen added to party Michael R. Pompeo(pty:dft), Attorney Margaret Ming Chen added to party Carl C. Risch(pty:dft), Attorney Margaret Ming Chen added to party Conn Shrader(pty:dft), Attorney Margaret Ming Chen added to party U.S. Department of State(pty:dft), Attorney Margaret Ming Chen added to party Chad F. Wolf(pty:dft))(Chen, Margaret) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Andy Chang, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Genoveva Ortega, Legal Assistant. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General via Certified Mail. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to agency via Certified Mail. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (Gukasyan, Armen) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants William P. Barr, Michael R. Pompeo, Carl C. Risch, Conn Shrader, U.S. Department of State, and Chad F. Wolf. (jtil) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Andy Chang. (Gukasyan, Armen) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Andy Chang. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Attachment No. 1 to Summons, #2 Supplement Attachment No. 2 to Summons)(Gukasyan, Armen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: CACDC-25468475 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Andy Chang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7) (Attorney Armen Gukasyan added to party Andy Chang(pty:pla))(Gukasyan, Armen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.