Sirag Khorshed et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
Sirag Khorshed and Maha Khorshed |
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Penegon West Inc dba Hornburg Jaguar Land Rover, Does 1 to 25, inclusive, Penegon West, Inc. and Penegon West, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Ja Hornburg Jagua/Land Rover |
2:2020cv01756 |
February 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Gail J Standish |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Defendants Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Penegon West, Inc... (Wolf, Matthew) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF INTENT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on April 23, 2020. (gga) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendants Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Penegon West, Inc. (filed in state court 2/11/20, submitted as document 5, attachment 1)(esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Penegon West, Inc., Jury Demand, filed by plaintiffs Maha Khorshed, Sirag Khorshed. (filed in state court 1/19/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 4) (esa) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Penegon West Inc dba Hornburg Jaguar Land Rover, re Notice (Other) #5 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 , Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 2/24/20. (Wolf, Matthew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Re-Filing State Court Answer filed by Defendants Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Penegon West Inc dba Hornburg Jaguar Land Rover. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Answer)(Wolf, Matthew) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Penegon West Inc dba Hornburg Jaguar Land Rover identifying Penegon West, Inc. is a subsidiary of Pendragon North America Automotive, Inc., which is a subsidiary of Pendragon PLC as Corporate Parent. (Wolf, Matthew) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC identifying Jaguar Land Rover Limited, which is a subsidiary of Jaguar Land Rover Holdings Limited, which is a subsidiary of Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC, which is a subsidiary of TML Holdings Pte. Ltd., which is a subsidiary of Tata Motors Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Wolf, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Penegon West Inc dba Hornburg Jaguar Land Rover. (Wolf, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV01351 Receipt No: ACACDC-25482645 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Penegon West Inc dba Hornburg Jaguar Land Rover. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B Lease Agreement, #3 Exhibit C Answer) (Attorney Matthew C Wolf added to party Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Matthew C Wolf added to party Penegon West Inc dba Hornburg Jaguar Land Rover(pty:dft))(Wolf, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.