John Wesley Williams v. Jason Black et al
John Wesley Williams |
A. Martinez, S Wenkler, James Sanchez, Miller and Jason Black |
2:2020cv01805 |
February 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S Gutierrez |
Frederick F Mumm |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: denying #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee: IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. Reason: Other: Section 1915(g) applies. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. (bm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (jtil) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff John Wesley Williams. (jtil) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff John Wesley Williams against All Defendants, pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.