Altair Logix LLC v. FLIR Systems, Inc.
| Altair Logix LLC |
| FLIR Systems, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv01824 |
| February 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Patrick T Michael counsel for Defendant FLIR Systems, Inc.. Adding Patrick T. Michael as counsel of record for FLIR Systems, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant FLIR Systems, Inc.. (Michael, Patrick) |
| Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Krista Sue Schwartz counsel for Defendant FLIR Systems, Inc.. Adding Krista S. Schwartz as counsel of record for FLIR Systems, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant FLIR Systems, Inc.. (Schwartz, Krista) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Patrick T Michael on behalf of Defendant FLIR Systems, Inc. (Attorney Patrick T Michael added to party FLIR Systems, Inc.(pty:dft))(Michael, Patrick) |
Filing 14
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT FLIR SYSTEMS, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF ALTAIR LOGIX LLCS COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT #13 , by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Defendant FLIR Systems, Inc. answer due 6/22/2020. (shb)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to June 22, 2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant FLIR Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schwartz, Krista) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Krista Sue Schwartz on behalf of Defendant FLIR Systems, Inc. (Attorney Krista Sue Schwartz added to party FLIR Systems, Inc.(pty:dft))(Schwartz, Krista) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC, upon Defendant FLIR Systems, Inc. served on 4/2/2020, answer due 4/23/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Anderson, Kirk) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: GRANTING #8 Non-Resident Attorney David R. Bennett APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC, designating M. Grant McArthur as local counsel. (shb)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys)
|
| Filing 8 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David R. Bennett to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-25623724) filed by Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit COGS, #2 Proposed Order) (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant FLIR Systems, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Altair Logix LLC, identifying Mavexar LLC. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Altair Logix LLC. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25511705 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Kirk J Anderson added to party Altair Logix LLC(pty:pla))(Anderson, Kirk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Altair Logix LLC v. FLIR Systems, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Altair Logix LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kirk J Anderson |
| Represented By: | David R Bennett |
| Represented By: | M Grant McArthur |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FLIR Systems, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Krista Sue Schwartz |
| Represented By: | Patrick T Michael |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
