The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. v. Maya Nudel et al
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. |
| Judy Simon, Does 1 to 10 inclusive, Carlos Alvarado, Felipe Flores, Maya Flores, Maria Rivas, Paul Grain, Maria Sinutko, Maya Nudel, Marty Romine, Anthony Lopez, Heriberta Flores and Alfredo Flores Frias |
| 2:2020cv01905 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Receipt of cv-103 Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court received on 3/16/2020 by A. Toledo, Deputy Clerk (shb) |
| Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, Northwest District. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, Northwest District. (gk) |
Filing 8
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, Case Number 19VEUD01012, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) (gk)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Denying #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that this case is hereby REMANDED to state court. IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. Reasons: District Court lacks jurisdiction. Improper removal: lack of federal question jurisdiction, no diversity, and amount in controversy is less than $10,000. Plaintiff could not have initiated this unlawful detainer action in federal court. (gk)
|
| Filing 6 Notice of Electronic Filing re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Notice of Removal, #1 , REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 e-mailed to Cori Jones bounced due to The email address you entered couldn't be found. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lmh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (car) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Marty Romine. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Marty Romine (car) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, case number 19VEUD01012 with Conformed copy of complaint. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. Filing fee $400, filed by Defendant Marty Romine (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) Modified on 3/2/2020 (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
