Bradely Rava et al v. Los Angeles County Harbor UCLA Medical Center et al
| Bradley Rava, Courtney Rava and Amber Rava |
| Jane Doe and Los Angeles County Harbor UCLA Medical Center |
| 2:2020cv01933 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bradley Rava. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Los Angeles County Harbor UCLA Medical Center. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Jane Doe, Los Angeles County Harbor UCLA Medical Center. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick.(Filing fee $ 400:PAID) Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Bradley Rava. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
