David Ledrew White v. George Jaime
| David Ledrew White |
| George Jaime |
| 2:2020cv01934 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: granting #6 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File. Good cause appearing, Respondent's application for an extension of time to and including May 1, 2020, within which to file a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. (dml)
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Motion to Dismiss filed by Respondent George Jaime. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order re Application for Extension of Time to File Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) (Karlin, Louis) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Louis W Karlin on behalf of Respondent George Jaime (Attorney Louis W Karlin added to party George Jaime(pty:res))(Karlin, Louis) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION In Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner David Ledrew White. (dml) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Respondent George Jaime file Answer to the Petition not later than 4/16/2020. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (dml)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 and CV-69) (ghap) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver.(Filing fee $ 5:FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner David Ledrew White. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: David Ledrew White v. George Jaime | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David Ledrew White | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: George Jaime | |
| Represented By: | Louis W Karlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
