Rochelle Boston v. Aecom, et al
Plaintiff: Rochelle Boston
Defendant: Aecom and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv02077
Filed: March 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Patrick J Walsh
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT AECOM TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court hereby approves this Stipulation and ORDERS that Defendant AECOMs time to respond to Plaintiff ROCHELLE BOSTONs Initial Complaint is extended to May 22, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
April 17, 2020 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Aecom answer now due 5/22/2020, filed by Defendant Aecom. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order RE EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT AECOM TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS INITIAL COMPLAINT)(Siegel, Adam)
March 16, 2020 Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Defendant Aecom.(Attorney Adam Yuda Siegel added to party Aecom(pty:dft))(Siegel, Adam)
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
March 4, 2020 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Aecom. (esa)
March 4, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
March 4, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (esa)
March 3, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rochelle Boston, identifying AECOM. (Jenkins, C)
March 3, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rochelle Boston. (Jenkins, C)
March 3, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Rochelle Boston. (Jenkins, C)
March 3, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25590229 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Rochelle Boston. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - EEOC Right to Sue, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - DFEH Right to Sue) (Attorney C Genevieve Jenkins added to party Rochelle Boston(pty:pla))(Jenkins, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rochelle Boston v. Aecom, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rochelle Boston
Represented By: C Genevieve Jenkins
Represented By: Zainah Ahmed Alfi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aecom
Represented By: Adam Yuda Siegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?