Joe Larry Bryant v. Warren L. Montgomery
Joe Larry Bryant |
Warren L. Montgomery |
2:2020cv02170 |
March 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen L Stevenson |
Stephen V Wilson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss ; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by RESPONDENT Warren L. Montgomery. (Chung, Charles) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Charles Chung counsel for Respondent Warren L. Montgomery. Adding CHARLES CHUNG as counsel of record for WARREN L. MONTGOMERY for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by RESPONDENT WARREN L. MONTGOMERY. (Attorney Charles Chung added to party Warren L. Montgomery(pty:res))(Chung, Charles) |
Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Please read this order carefully. Within 14 days of the date of this order, Respondent shall file and serve a notice of appearance. (see document for further details) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition for writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Petitioner's Consent) (et) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO PROCEED INFORMA PAUPERIS #1 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. (et) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Joe Larry Bryant. (lh) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Filing Fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Joe Larry Bryant. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Joe Larry Bryant v. Warren L. Montgomery | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Joe Larry Bryant | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warren L. Montgomery | |
Represented By: | Charles Chung |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.