Joe Larry Bryant v. Warren L. Montgomery
Petitioner: Joe Larry Bryant
Respondent: Warren L. Montgomery
Case Number: 2:2020cv02170
Filed: March 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen L Stevenson
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss ; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by RESPONDENT Warren L. Montgomery. (Chung, Charles)
March 30, 2020 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Charles Chung counsel for Respondent Warren L. Montgomery. Adding CHARLES CHUNG as counsel of record for WARREN L. MONTGOMERY for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by RESPONDENT WARREN L. MONTGOMERY. (Attorney Charles Chung added to party Warren L. Montgomery(pty:res))(Chung, Charles)
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Please read this order carefully. Within 14 days of the date of this order, Respondent shall file and serve a notice of appearance. (see document for further details) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition for writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Petitioner's Consent) (et)
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO PROCEED INFORMA PAUPERIS #1 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. (et)
March 5, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh)
March 5, 2020 Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Joe Larry Bryant. (lh)
March 5, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Filing Fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Joe Larry Bryant. (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joe Larry Bryant v. Warren L. Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joe Larry Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warren L. Montgomery
Represented By: Charles Chung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?