Rusnak Pasadena v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
| Rusnak Pasadena |
| Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC and DOES 1-20, inclusive |
| Rusnak/Pasadena |
| 2:2020cv02302 |
| March 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Andre Birotte |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 7/17/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Personally served on 03/10/2020. (Saviss, Panteha) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Mail served on 03/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Saviss, Panteha) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #3 , Notice of Appearance #4 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. in Los Angeles Superior Court on 3/9/2020, attached as Exhibit B.(jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Rusnak Pasadena in Los Angeles Superior Court on 1/31/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, of Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC's Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal served on 03/10/2020. (Saviss, Panteha) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Saviss, Panteha) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice of Appearance #4 , Notice of Appearance #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 served on 3/10/2020. (Saviss, Panteha) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Panteha Alyssa Saviss on behalf of Movant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (Saviss, Panteha) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Panteha Alyssa Saviss on behalf of Movant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (Saviss, Panteha) |
| Filing 2 Defendant's Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, (Saviss, Panteha) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County of Los Angeles, case number 20STCV04241 Receipt No: ACACDC-25678844 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B) (Attorney Panteha Alyssa Saviss added to party Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC(pty:bkmov))(Saviss, Panteha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
