Regine Ingram, et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al
Eugene Ingram and Regine Ingram |
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
2:2020cv02327 |
March 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Charles F Eick |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events Service Documents Service of Subsequent Document Filings - select - Proof of Service (subsequent documents). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Shirdel, Babak) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 7/24/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Certificate of Service filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Shirdel, Babak) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Shirdel, Babak) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.. (Shirdel, Babak) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation, (Shirdel, Babak) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Shirdel, Babak) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court-Central, case number 19STCV00950 Receipt No: ACACDC-25694978 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Babak Shirdel, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (Attorney Babak Shirdel added to party Costco Wholesale Corporation(pty:dft))(Shirdel, Babak) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, Jury Demand, filed by defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (filed in state court 3/4/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 4)(esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation, Does, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiffs Regine Ingram, Eugene Ingram. (filed in state court 1/10/2019, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa) |
COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiffs Regine Ingram, Eugene Ingram, upon Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation served on 2/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 3) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.