Brian Whitaker v. 1331 W. Washington Partners et al
| Brian Whitaker |
| Does 1-10, Sildan Corporation, 1331 W. Washington Partners, Bernard Perloff and 1329 Abbott Kinney, Inc |
| 2:2020cv02362 |
| March 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant 1331 W. Washington Partners, Does 1-10, Bernard Perloff, 1329 Abbott Kinney, Inc amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Christopher) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, re Notice of Association of Counsel #11 served on 5/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Christopher) |
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation for Leave #12 : GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff may file his First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall file said Complaint no more than seven days from the date of this Order. (bm)
|
| Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION for Leave to file First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FAC, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Christopher A. Seabock on behalf of Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. Filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker (Attorney Christopher A Seabock added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Seabock, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Sildan Corporation served on 4/10/2020, answer due 5/1/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jodi Roden - Authorized to accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant 1331 W. Washington Partners served on 4/5/2020, answer due 4/27/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Larry (Doe), property manager at Perloff/Webster in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Bernard Perloff and Sildan Corporation. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25707254 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
