United States of America et al v. Plains All American Pipeline L.P. et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, California State Lands Commission, California Department of Parks and Recreation, State Of California, The Regents of the University of California, The People of the State of California, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board and California Department of Forestry and Fire Protections Office of State Fire Marshal |
| Plains All American Pipeline L.P, Plains All American Pipeline L.P. and Plains Pipeline L.P. |
| 2:2020cv02415 |
| March 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| John E McDermott |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Mitchell Elliott Rishe counsel for Plaintiffs California Department of Parks and Recreation, California State Lands Commission. Adding Mitchell Rishe as counsel of record for California Department of Parks and Recreation; California State Lands Commission for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff California Department of Parks and Recreation; California State Lands Commission. (Attorney Mitchell Elliott Rishe added to party California Department of Parks and Recreation(pty:pla), Attorney Mitchell Elliott Rishe added to party California State Lands Commission(pty:pla))(Rishe, Mitchell) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jessica Barclay-Strobel on behalf of Plaintiff State Of California (Attorney Jessica Barclay-Strobel added to party State Of California(pty:pla))(Barclay-Strobel, Jessica) |
| Filing 8 First NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael T Zarro on behalf of Plaintiff State Of California (Attorney Michael T Zarro added to party State Of California(pty:pla))(Zarro, Michael) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, re Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice of Related Case(s) #4 , Notice of Lodging #6 , Notice (Other) #5 served on 03/13/2020. (O'Brien, Bradley) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Notice of Lodging of the Consent Decree re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Decree)(O'Brien, Bradley) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Notice of Pendency or Other Actions (O'Brien, Bradley) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Related Case(s): 2:15-cv-04113; 2:15-cv-04440; 2:16-cv-02988; 2:16-cv-03157; 2:16-cv-02730; 2:16-cv-03283; 8:16-cv-01521; 2:17-cv-09304 (O'Brien, Bradley) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Bradley R O'Brien counsel for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Adding Bradley R. O'Brien as counsel of record for United States of America for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (O'Brien, Bradley) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (O'Brien, Bradley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attorney Bradley R O'Brien added to party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(pty:pla))(O'Brien, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
