Andres Carmona-Morales v. Mike Rovner Construction Inc. et al
| Carmona-Morales and Andres Carmona-Morales |
| Mike Rovner Construction Inc. and Does 1-20, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv02473 |
| March 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Terry J Hatter |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE DEFENDANT MIKE ROVNER CONSTRUCTION, INC.`S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF ITS PETITION AND NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Mike Rovner Construction Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E)(Langberg, Aaron) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mike Rovner Construction Inc., identifying Mike L. Rovner and Janet L. Rovner as Interested Parties. (Langberg, Aaron) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mike Rovner Construction Inc.. (Langberg, Aaron) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV01803 Receipt No: ACACDC-25733255 - Fee: $400, filed by Attorney for Defendant Mike Rovner Construction Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Attorney Aaron David Langberg added to party Mike Rovner Construction Inc.(pty:dft))(Langberg, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
