Lawrence White v. Stu Sherman
White Lawrence and Lawrence White |
Stu Sherman |
2:2020cv02518 |
March 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Patricia A Donahue |
Sheri Pym |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER OF THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE - OCMJ# 20-085 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF THE CALENDAR of Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Donahue, this case is transferred from the calendar of Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Patricia A Donahue for all further proceedings authorized by statute, local rules and general orders. All documents subsequently filed shall bear this new case designation 2:20-CV-02518-CJC-PD absent further order of the Court. (aco) |
Filing 9 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 into the registry of the Court from Lawrence White. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA205326. (Fe) |
Filing 10 Petitioner Respond to Motion File by Attorney General for Dismiss #8 filed by Petitioner Lawrence White. (es) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; EXHIBITS A--D filed by Respondent Stu Sherman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Estaville, Toni) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Granting #6 ,Respondent may file a motion to dismiss limited to the jurisdictional issue that the Petition is an unauthorized successive Petition, without waiving any other arguments. (kca) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION to FILE MOTION TO DISMISS LIMITED TO LACK OF JURISDICTION OVER THE UNAUTHORIZED SUCCESSIVE PETITION; DECLARATION OF TONI R. JOHNS ESTAVILLE; EXHIBIT A; [PROPOSED] ORDER filed by Respondent Stu Sherman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order) (Estaville, Toni) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Toni R. Johns Estaville on behalf of Respondent Stu Sherman. (Attorney Toni R Johns Estaville added to party Stu Sherman(pty:res))(Estaville, Toni) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Consent) (kca) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner White Lawrence. (lh) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym.(Filing Fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner White Lawrence. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.