Dana Tompkins Barnett v. County of Los Angeles, et al
| Dana Tompkins Barnett |
| Jonathan E. Sherin, M.D., ALEX VILLANUEVA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,, Sheriff Alex Villanueva, Jonathan E. Sherin, M.D., PH.D. and County of Los Angeles |
| 2:2020cv02530 |
| March 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): A proposed order shall be submitted as a separate attachment to the Motion to to a Notice of Lodging. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. Motion set for hearing on 6/15/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Tiffany Rollins, #2 Exhibit A) (Attorney Tiffany Nicole Rollins added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft)) (Rollins, Tiffany)
|
|
Filing 14
STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to County of Los Angeles answer now due 5/13/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Attorney Rickey Ivie added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Ivie, Rickey)
|
|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson, (lc)
|
|
Filing 12
DECLARATION of Shane V. Hapuarachy RE: COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULES GOVERNING ELECTRONIC FILING filed by Plaintiff Dana Tompkins Barnett. (Hapuarachy, Shane)
|
|
Filing 11
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Jonathan E. Sherin, M.D., PH.D. (lh)
|
|
Filing 10
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Alex Villanueva. (lh)
|
|
Filing 9
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant County of Los Angeles. (lh)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh)
|
|
Filing 6
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Dana Tompkins Barnett. (Hapuarachy, Shane)
|
|
Filing 5
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Dana Tompkins Barnett. (Hapuarachy, Shane)
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Dana Tompkins Barnett. (Hapuarachy, Shane)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dana Tompkins Barnett, (Hapuarachy, Shane)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dana Tompkins Barnett. (Hapuarachy, Shane)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25757898 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Dana Tompkins Barnett. (Attorney Shane V Hapuarachy added to party Dana Tompkins Barnett(pty:pla))(Hapuarachy, Shane)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
