Patricia Walker v. Brickell Subsidiary, Inc. et al
| Patricia Walker |
| DOES 1-10, inclusive, Reginald Hardy, Andrew Sklawer, Brickell Subsidiary, Inc. and Brickell Subsidiary, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as Brickell Biotech, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv02540 |
| March 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER ON STIPULATION AND MUTUAL AGREEMENT TO BINDING ARBITRATION, #7 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this lawsuit, including all causes of action therein, is hereby referred to binding arbitration in Los Angeles County, California. All pending dates in this Court are vacated and the action is stayed pending completion of arbitration. The parties are required to file a status report on the action every 90 days until the matter is resolved and have 14 days after the completion of arbitration to file their report or file a dismissal. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to confirm, modify, vacate, or enforce the arbitration award rendered in this action and to make any other Orders it deems necessary and proper. (shb)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Binding Arbitration filed by Defendants Brickell Subsidiary, Inc., Reginald Hardy, Andrew Sklawer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order on Stipulation and Mutual Agreement to Binding Arbitration)(Brown, James) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Brickell Subsidiary, Inc., Does, Reginald Hardy, Andrew Sklawer. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Patricia Walker. (FILED IN SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 1/27/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Anjuli M. Cargain re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 (signed) Declaration of Anjuli M. Cargain in Support of Notice of Removal [see Document 1-2] filed by Defendants Brickell Subsidiary, Inc., Reginald Hardy, Andrew Sklawer. (Brown, James) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Brickell Subsidiary, Inc., Reginald Hardy, Andrew Sklawer, identifying Brickell Biotech, Inc.. (Brown, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Brickell Subsidiary, Inc., Reginald Hardy, Andrew Sklawer. (Brown, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Barbara County Superior Court, case number 20CV00478 Receipt No: ACACDC-25760992 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Reginald Hardy, Brickell Subsidiary, Inc., Andrew Sklawer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Summons, Complaint, civil case cover, notice of assignment, #2 Declaration Declaration of Anjuli M. Cargain in Support of Defendants' Notice of Removal, #3 Declaration Declaration of Reginald Hardy in Support of Notice of Removal, #4 Declaration Declaration of Andrew Sklawer in Support of Notice of Removal) (Attorney James S Brown added to party Brickell Subsidiary, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney James S Brown added to party Reginald Hardy(pty:dft), Attorney James S Brown added to party Andrew Sklawer(pty:dft))(Brown, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
