Kenneth Thomas Harris v. P. Eaton
Kenneth Thomas Harris |
P. Eaton |
2:2020cv02550 |
March 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Valerie Baker Fairbank |
Michael R Wilner |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STAYING ACTION AND DISMISSING CLAIMS by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Petitioners request is granted. The federal action will be stayed during the pendency of state proceedings under Kelly. Petitioners unexhausted claims (designated in the Attorney Generals papers as Grounds 1F-1N, and 2-5) are voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner will file a report with this Court on the first day of every other month beginning in June 2020 (then August 2020, October 2020, etc.) (See Minute Order for further details) re: Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #10 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #6 (vm) |
Filing 10 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Petitioner Kenneth Thomas Harris. #6 (vm) |
Filing 9 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS / STRATTON NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Petitioners response to the motion will be due by or before June 8. (See Minute Order for further details) re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #6 . (vm) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Respondent P. Eaton. correcting NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #6 (Kline, Jonathan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF LODGING filed NOTICE OF LODGING IN 28 U.S.C. 2254 CASE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #6 (Attachments: #1 Opinion, #2 AOB, #3 RB, #4 Appellant's Reply Brief, #5 HCP, COA Case No. B283951, #6 Informal Response to HCP_COA B283951, #7 Reply to Informal Response, #8 HDO_COA Case No. B283951, #9 Modification of HDO, COA Case No. B283951, #10 Petition for Rehearing, COA Case No. B278284, #11 Petition for Rehearing Denial Order_COA Case No. B278284, #12 Petition for Review, CSC Case No. S249726, #13 Petition for Review, CSC Case No. S249715, #14 Review Denial Order, CSC Case No. S249726, #15 Printout of Docket CSC Case No. S249715, #16 HCP, CSC Case No. S257712, #17 Printout of Docket in COA Case No B298170, #18 Printout of Docket COA Case No. B298996, #19 Printout of Docket CSC Case No.S257712, #20 HCP, CSC Case No. S261172, #21 Printout of Docket CSC Case No. S261172)(Kline, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Respondent P. Eaton. (Kline, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office JONATHAN J. KLINE on behalf of RESPONDENT P. Eaton. (Attorney Jonathan J Kline added to party P. Eaton(pty:res))(Kline, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Respondent P. Eaton to file Motion to Dismiss/Answer to the Petition not later than 4/20/2020. Reply due by 5/20/2020. (See Minute Order for further details) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (vm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Kenneth Thomas Harris. (lh) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Filing Fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Kenneth Thomas Harris. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kenneth Thomas Harris v. P. Eaton | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: P. Eaton | |
Represented By: | Jonathan J Kline |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Kenneth Thomas Harris | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.