Jane Doe v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
| JANE DOE |
| Does 1 through 25, Inclusive,, National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak, Jerron Rolen, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Does 1 through 25, inclusive and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as AMTRAK |
| 2:2020cv02569 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, having been notified by the Notice of Settlement #8 that the case settled, hereby orders this action dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction for sixty (60) days to vacate this order and to reopen the action upon showing of good cause that the settlement has not been completed. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement of Entire Case filed by plaintiff Jane Doe. (Sampson, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF INTENT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on May 14, 2020. (gga) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney D. Matthew Dreesen. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 3/12/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Jerron Rolen. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/30/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak, (Murphy, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak. (Murphy, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV38931 Receipt No: CACDC-25776710 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Michael E Murphy added to party National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak(pty:dft))(Murphy, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
