Kellen John Clarke v. San Luis Obispo Probation Department et al
Plaintiff: Kellen John Clarke
Defendant: San Luis Obispo Probation Department, Kyle Nancolas, James E. Salio and Brenda Flores
Case Number: 2:2020cv02723
Filed: March 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael R Wilner
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. Case DISMISSED Immediately by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (lc)
March 26, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE regarding status of case filed by plaintiff Kellen John Clarke. (vm)
March 25, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE regarding status of case filed by plaintiff Kellen John Clarke. (vm)
March 24, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap)
March 24, 2020 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Kellen John Clarke. (ghap)
March 24, 2020 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Brenda Flores(individual), Brenda Flores(San Luis Obispo County Deputy Probation Officer, official capacity), Kyle Nancolas(San Luis Obispo County Supervising Probation Officer, official capacity), Kyle Nancolas(individual), James E. Salio(individual), James E. Salio(San Luis Obispo County Chief Probation Officer, official capacity), San Luis Obispo Probation Department pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R Wilner., filed by plaintiff Kellen John Clarke. (ghap) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/25/2020: #1 CV-71) (ghap).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kellen John Clarke v. San Luis Obispo Probation Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kellen John Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Luis Obispo Probation Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kyle Nancolas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James E. Salio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brenda Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?