Jane Doe, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
Plaintiff: JANE DOE and M. S.
Defendant: County of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2020cv02748
Filed: March 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendants County of Los Angeles, Does 1-50 inclusive. (lc)
April 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Dunn, Brian)
April 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #10 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. Resubmitted summons prepared with Incorrect case number as: 2: 20-cv-0278 ODW-PVC. Please correct to include the missing digit to read as: 2:20-cv-02748-ODW-PVC. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc)
April 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Dunn, Brian)
April 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #8 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. 1) Case number missing assigned Judge and Magistrate's initials. Case number is to read correctly as: 2:20-cv-02748-ODW-PVC. 2) No et als permitted on summons caption. All parties to be listed exactly as named in the caption of the complaint.. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc)
April 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe, M. S.. (Dunn, Brian)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information.. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): It appears a guardian ad litem is named in this case but no Petition seeking such appointment has been filed. A Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem must be filed when the appointment of a guardian ad litem is required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). See Local Rule 17-1. Counsel must file a Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa)
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (esa)
March 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF JANE DOE, (Dunn, Brian)
March 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JANE DOE. (Dunn, Brian)
March 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25846626 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff JANE DOE. (Attorney Brian T Dunn added to party JANE DOE(pty:pla))(Dunn, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jane Doe, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Represented By: Brian T Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: M. S.
Represented By: Brian T Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Los Angeles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?