Ian Marks v. Sawyer Aviation, LLC et al
Ian Marks |
Does 1 to 100, inclusive and Sawyer Aviation, LLC |
2:2020cv02854 |
March 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Gail J Standish |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by Defendant Sawyer Aviation, LLC. (Gjedsted, Alyssa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Sawyer Aviation, LLC. Related Case(s): NO RELATED ACTION (Gjedsted, Alyssa) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Sawyer Aviation, LLC identifying SAWYER AVIATION, LLC as Corporate Parent. (Gjedsted, Alyssa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sawyer Aviation, LLC, identifying Plaintiff IAN MARKS; N. Nick Ebrahimian, Esq., and Joshua Webster, Esq. of Lavi & Ebrahimian, LLP; Defendant SAWYER AVIATION, LLC.. (Gjedsted, Alyssa) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sawyer Aviation, LLC. (Gjedsted, Alyssa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Aneles Superior Court, case number 20STCV04573 Receipt No: ACACDC-25874240 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Sawyer Aviation, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Tammi Russell, #2 Declaration of Alyssa Gjedsted) (Attorney Alyssa S Gjedsted added to party Sawyer Aviation, LLC(pty:dft))(Gjedsted, Alyssa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.