Robert Jacobsen et al v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.
Jerald Sacks, Joonja Sacks, Lucille Jacobsen and Robert Jacobsen |
Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. and Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. |
2:2020cv02860 |
March 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
R Gary Klausner |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Rafaela Patricia Castells on behalf of Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. (Attorney Rafaela Patricia Castells added to party Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.(pty:dft))(Castells, Rafaela) |
Filing 20 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. The stipulation #19 is granted. Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.'s response to the Complaints in the below listed cases is ordered moved to 6/2/2020. (See Order for specifics). (jp) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Initial Complaint filed by defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Maltzman, Jeffrey) |
Filing 18 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES upon filing of the complaint by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (vv) |
Filing 17 Defendants WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs Joonja Sacks, Robert Jacobsen, Jerald Sacks, Lucille Jacobsen. upon Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/30/2020, answer due 5/29/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Edgar R. Nield. (Simmrin, Michael) |
Filing 16 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:20-cv-02267 RGK(SKx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero and Judge Otis D. Wright, II to Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-02860 RGK(SKx). Signed by Judge R. Gary Klausner (rn) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Princess Cruise Lines Ltd., identifying Carnival Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Nield, Edgar) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.. Related Case(s): 2:20-CV-02267 (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Maltzman, Jeffrey) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jeffrey B Maltzman on behalf of Defendant Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Jeffrey B Maltzman added to party Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.(pty:dft))(Maltzman, Jeffrey) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Gabrielle DeSantis-Nield on behalf of Defendant Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Gabrielle DeSantis-Nield added to party Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.(pty:dft))(DeSantis-Nield, Gabrielle) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Edgar R Nield on behalf of Defendant Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Edgar R Nield added to party Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.(pty:dft))(Nield, Edgar) |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Debi F. Chalik to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Lucille Jacobsen, Robert Jacobsen, Jerald Sacks, Joonja Sacks and designating Michael A. Simmrin as local counsel #2 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information.. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Lucille Jacobsen, Robert Jacobsen, Jerald Sacks, Joonja Sacks. (Simmrin, Michael) |
Filing 4 Plaintiffs NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Lucille Jacobsen, Robert Jacobsen, Jerald Sacks, Joonja Sacks, (Simmrin, Michael) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Lucille Jacobsen, Robert Jacobsen, Jerald Sacks, Joonja Sacks. (Simmrin, Michael) |
Filing 2 First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Debi F. Chalik to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Lucille Jacobsen, Robert Jacobsen, Jerald Sacks, Joonja Sacks (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-25879657) filed by Plaintiffs Lucille Jacobsen, Robert Jacobsen, Jerald Sacks, Joonja Sacks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order) (Simmrin, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25879582 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Joonja Sacks, Robert Jacobsen, Jerald Sacks, Lucille Jacobsen. (Attorney Michael A Simmrin added to party Lucille Jacobsen(pty:pla), Attorney Michael A Simmrin added to party Robert Jacobsen(pty:pla), Attorney Michael A Simmrin added to party Jerald Sacks(pty:pla), Attorney Michael A Simmrin added to party Joonja Sacks(pty:pla))(Simmrin, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.