Aristors Licensing LLC v. SnapComms, Inc.

Plaintiff: Aristors Licensing LLC
Defendant: SnapComms, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2020cv03013
Filed: March 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Consuelo B Marshall
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2020 Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Noel Franco Chakkalakal to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Counter Claimant SnapComms, Inc., Defendant SnapComms, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26617741) filed by Defendant SnapComms, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing from The Supreme Court of Texas, #2 Proposed Order) (Talebi, Rodeen)
May 20, 2020 Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ricardo J. Bonilla to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Counter Claimant SnapComms, Inc., Defendant SnapComms, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26505816) filed by Defendant SnapComms, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Talebi, Rodeen)
May 19, 2020 Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: granting #12 #13 #14 Non-Resident Attorney Neil J. McNabnay APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of SnapComms, Inc., designating Rodeen, Talebi as local counsel. (yl)
May 19, 2020 Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Neil J. McNabnay to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Counter Claimant SnapComms, Inc., Defendant SnapComms, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 5/18/2020, Receipt No. BCACDC-26473194) #13 ) filed by Defendant SnapComms, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Talebi, Rodeen)
May 18, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Neil J. McNabnay to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Counter Claimant SnapComms, Inc., Defendant SnapComms, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 5/18/2020, Receipt No. BCACDC-26473194) #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local counsel's contact numbers on the application are different than what are listed on the proposed order. (Thrasher, Lupe)
May 18, 2020 Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Neil J. McNabnay to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Counter Claimant SnapComms, Inc., Defendant SnapComms, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 5/18/2020, Receipt No. BCACDC-26473194) filed by Defendant SnapComms, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Talebi, Rodeen)
May 18, 2020 Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Neil J. McNabnay to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Counter Claimant SnapComms, Inc., Defendant SnapComms, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. BCACDC-26473194) filed by Defendant SnapComms, Inc.. (Talebi, Rodeen)
May 14, 2020 Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Scheduling Conference set for 8/18/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (ys)
May 13, 2020 Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Counter Claimant SnapComms, Inc., Defendant SnapComms, Inc. identifying SnapComms Limited as Corporate Parent. (Talebi, Rodeen)
May 13, 2020 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against Aristors Licensing LLC filed by Defendant SnapComms, Inc..(Attorney Rodeen Talebi added to party SnapComms, Inc.(pty:dft))(Talebi, Rodeen)
April 1, 2020 Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys)
March 31, 2020 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant SnapComms, Inc. (car)
March 31, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car)
March 31, 2020 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Aristors Licensing LLC identifying NONE as Corporate Parent. (Ritcheson, Steven)
March 31, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Aristors Licensing LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven)
March 31, 2020 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Aristors Licensing LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven)
March 31, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Aristors Licensing LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven)
March 31, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25917564 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Aristors Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2) (Attorney Steven W Ritcheson added to party Aristors Licensing LLC(pty:pla))(Ritcheson, Steven)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aristors Licensing LLC v. SnapComms, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aristors Licensing LLC
Represented By: Steven W Ritcheson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SnapComms, Inc.
Represented By: Rodeen Talebi
Represented By: Neil J McNabnay
Represented By: Ricardo J Bonilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?