Display Technologies, LLC v. Ava Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff: Display Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Ava Enterprises Inc
Case Number: 2:2020cv03054
Filed: April 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2020 Filing 27 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal) (gk)
August 10, 2020 Filing 26 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Display Technologies, LLC. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Lobbin, Stephen)
August 10, 2020 Filing 25 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Display Technologies, LLC. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Lobbin, Stephen)
August 10, 2020 Filing 24 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Ava Enterprises Inc. Motion set for hearing on 9/18/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Motion to Dismiss, #2 Declaration of Sam Rabbani, #3 Declaration of Robert Steinberg, #4 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Robert Steinberg, #5 Proposed Order) (Steinberg, Robert)
August 10, 2020 Filing 23 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ava Enterprises Inc, identifying Ava Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Boss Audio Systems and Display Technologies, LLC. (Steinberg, Robert)
August 10, 2020 Filing 22 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Robert Steinberg counsel for Defendant Ava Enterprises Inc. Adding Robert Steinberg as counsel of record for Ava Enterprises, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Ava Enterprises, Inc.. (Attorney Robert Steinberg added to party Ava Enterprises Inc(pty:dft))(Steinberg, Robert)
August 10, 2020 Filing 21 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Display Technologies, LLC. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Lobbin, Stephen)
June 12, 2020 Filing 20 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On May 28, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff has filed a response to the Order to Show Cause re Lack of Prosecution on June 11, 2020. The Court deems that response satisfactory, and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
June 11, 2020 Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Display Technologies, LLC. upon Ava Enterprises Inc waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/9/2020, answer due 8/10/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Bob Steinberg. (Lobbin, Stephen)
May 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 6/11/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on the following Defendant(s): Ava Enterprises Inc. Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
April 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
April 2, 2020 Filing 16 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jimmy C. Chong. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap)
April 2, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
April 2, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap)
April 2, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF CASE TRANSFERRED IN: Formerly Case Number: 1:20-cv-00262-RGA, from District of Delaware (Wilmington). The above-referenced case has been transferred to this district and assigned the above civil case number 2:20-cv-03054 AB (SKx). (ghap)
April 2, 2020 Filing 12 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from Delaware
April 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SO ORDERED Granting #7 MOTION to Transfer Venue. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/1/2020. (nms) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
April 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SO ORDERED Granting #6 MOTION to Substitute Parties. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/1/2020. (nms) (Main Document 10 replaced on 4/1/2020) (nms). [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
April 1, 2020 Case transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. (nms) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
March 31, 2020 Filing 9 Letter to Honorable Richard G. Andrews, from Jimmy Chong, regarding response to Oral Order (D.I. 8 ). (Chong, Jimmy) Modified on 4/1/2020 (nms). [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORAL ORDER: Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file a letter identifying the defense counsel who has agreed to the pending motion to substitute (D.I. #6 ) and motion to transfer (D.I. #7 ). The letter is due no later than three days from the date of this Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/30/2020. (nms) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
March 29, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California - filed by Display Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Chong, Jimmy) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
March 28, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Substitute Parties - filed by Display Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chong, Jimmy) Modified on 3/30/2020 (nms). [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
March 9, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jay Johnson - filed by Display Technologies, LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
March 9, 2020 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jay Johnson filed by Display Technologies, LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/9/2020. (crb) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
February 26, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00258-RGA, 1:20-cv-00259-RGA, 1:20-cv-00260-RGA, 1:20-cv-00261-RGA, 1:20-cv-00262-RGA (rjb) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
February 24, 2020 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Ava Enterprises, LLC on 2/24/2020. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (mal) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
February 23, 2020 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Display Technologies, LLC. (mal) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
February 23, 2020 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 9,300,723. (mal) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
February 23, 2020 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]
February 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Ava Enterprises, LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2860585.) - filed by Display Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) [Transferred from Delaware on 4/2/2020.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Display Technologies, LLC v. Ava Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Display Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Jimmy C. Chong
Represented By: Stephen M Lobbin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ava Enterprises Inc
Represented By: Fan Zhang
Represented By: Robert Steinberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?