Chris Langer v. Sang Lee et al
| Chris Langer |
| Does 1-10, Connie Lee, Tony Y. lee, Sang Lee and Susan S. Lee |
| 2:2020cv03079 |
| April 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Dennis Jay Price, II counsel for Plaintiff Chris Langer. Phyl Grace is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Price, Dennis) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Tony Y. lee served on 5/2/2020, answer due 6/3/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Connie Lee - co occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Sang Lee served on 5/2/2020, answer due 6/3/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Connie Lee - co occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Tony Y. lee answer now due 6/3/2020; Connie Lee answer now due 6/3/2020; Sang Lee answer now due 6/3/2020; Susan S. Lee answer now due 6/3/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Tony Y. lee; Connie Lee; Sang Lee; Susan S. Lee.(Attorney Jeremy J Osher added to party Connie Lee(pty:dft), Attorney Jeremy J Osher added to party Sang Lee(pty:dft), Attorney Jeremy J Osher added to party Susan S. Lee(pty:dft), Attorney Jeremy J Osher added to party Tony Y. lee(pty:dft))(Osher, Jeremy) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Connie Lee served on 4/21/2020, answer due 5/12/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court has reviewed and considered Plaintiffs response to the Court's Order to Show Cause #10 . In light of the foregoing, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility state claims asserted in the Complaint. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(2) & ( c)( 4). (lom)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Susan S. Lee served on 4/13/2020, answer due 5/4/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Chris Langerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing as to why this Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the other state law claims alleged by Plaintiff. The Response shall be filed on or before APRIL 17, 2020. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court's declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (iv)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE to Parties Re (ADR-20) ADA Disability Access Litigation/Application for Stay and Early Mediation: PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED to serve the ADA Packet on Defendant(s) at the same time the summons and complaint are served, if possible. If, upon receipt of this Notice to Parties, Plaintiff has already served Defendant(s), Plaintiff must serve the ADA Packet no later than fourteen (14) days after this Notice to Parties is filed by the Court. Within three (3) days of serving Defendant(s), Plaintiff must file with the Court a proof of service indicating that the ADA Packet was served on Defendant(s). *See Notice for further details.* (smom) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Connie Lee, Sang Lee, Susan S. Lee, Tony Y. lee. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Chris Langer, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25943781 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Chris Langer(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
