Anthony Bouyer v. Miriam Kopilowitz et al
| Anthony Bouyer |
| Sam Feiner, Sylvia Weintraub, Miriam Kopilowitz, Does 1-10, inclusive, Sol Feiner and Tamara Feiner |
| 2:2020cv03088 |
| April 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Bouyer, upon Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Bouyer, upon Defendant Miriam Kopilowitz(as trustee of The Malka Hesse Feiner 1991 Trust) served on 4/20/2020, answer due 5/11/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Bouyer, upon Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Bouyer, upon Defendant Sylvia Weintraub(as trustee of The Malka Feiner 1991 Trust) served on 4/20/2020, answer due 5/11/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Bouyer, upon Defendant Sol Feiner served on 4/20/2020, answer due 5/11/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Bouyer, upon Defendant Sam Feiner served on 4/20/2020, answer due 5/11/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Bouyer, upon Defendant Tamara Feiner served on 4/20/2020, answer due 5/11/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 20
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
| Filing 19 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Tamara Feiner. (et) |
| Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sam Feiner. (et) |
| Filing 17 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sol Feiner. (et) |
| Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Miriam Kopilowitz (an individual). (et) |
| Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sylvia Weintraub(as trustee of The Malka Feiner 1991 Trust). (et) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sylvia Weintraub (an individual). (et) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Miriam Kopilowitz(as trustee of The Malka Hesse Feiner 1991 Trust). (et) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25944501 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party ANTHONY BOUYER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
